Critical Review of Michael Adrao A Deafening Silence at the Jorge B. Vargas Museum
Critical Review of Michael Adrao A Deafening Silence at the Jorge B. Vargas Museum
Michael Adrao’s A Deafening Silence stages an intervention inside the Jorge B. Vargas Museum where architectural restraint—expansive glazing, polished terrazzo, and disciplined sightlines—both frames and contests the work. The show deploys a restrained set of formal strategies: hand-drawn charcoal drawings, clustered baroque-inspired sculptural fragments, and a serpentine floor installation of modular objects. Together these elements promise an encounter with absence, rupture, and the uneasy translation between architectural order and organic proliferation. Below is a close, interpretive, and corrective assessment that preserves the show’s ambitions while rigorously interrogating its claims, spatial strategies, and curatorial framing.
---
Materials, Modes, and the Aesthetics of Silence
Adrao’s charcoal drawings treat silence as an aesthetic object—ornament rendered in soot, classical motifs smudged into organic overgrowth, and negative space left intentionally unresolved. The vertical diptychs that replace columnar entablatures with dense floral cores rely on the expressive economy of charcoal: line, shadow, and the tactile gesture of erasure. The medium’s materiality—grain, smudge, the hand’s residue—makes absence feel embodied. Where a photograph signals indexical replication, charcoal insists on mediation and subjective labour; it claims the artist’s hand as a witness to the very silences the work purports to address.
Yet this material advantage also reveals the work’s conceptual limits. The translation of architectural form into botanical mass has become a recurrent shorthand in postcolonial and ecological critique; rendered in charcoal, the move reads as formally elegiac but often substitutes expressive mark-making for sustained historical argument. The virtuosity of draughtsmanship risks functioning as affective cover: the marks are eloquent, but eloquence is not equivalent to analytic rigor.
---
Spatial Strategy and Curatorial Economy
Within the Vargas Museum’s volumes, the drawings demand proximity. Charcoal’s tactile register invites the viewer to lean in, to scrutinize smudges, to witness the trace of the artist’s palm. The floor-bound modular installation remains the show’s strongest spatial claim: an object-path that compels embodied navigation and temporal engagement. The tactile contrast—smoky two-dimensional draughtsmanship paired with three-dimensional clustered fragments—could have produced a potent dialectic.
Curatorially, however, the exhibition too often defaults to neat legibility. Drawings are framed and hung at conventional heights; the floor work, while intrusive, is not given relational staging that forces dialogue across modes. The result: charcoal’s intimacy is moderated rather than risked. The museum architecture acts as a neutral stage instead of a contesting force; the curatorial decision to preserve clean sightlines privileges aesthetic consumption over provocation.
---
The Language of Ornament and the Risk of Allegory
Adrao’s ornamental vocabulary—swirls, baroque echoes, and dense floral masses—remains central. Charcoal amplifies ornament’s ambiguous status: the same medium that can render delicate lace also registers the aggressive scrawl that erases it. Ornament here functions as both subject and method, yet its deployment risks flattening complexity into a single visual metaphor. When flowers stand in for resistance and columns for colonial scaffolding, the substitution becomes neat and facile.
The drawings would gain potency if the floral elements carried specific material histories: botanical provenance, colonial seed routes, the labor histories behind cultivation and trade. Without these anchors, charcoal’s evocative force can become a kind of formal consolation—beauty as placation rather than mobilization.
---
On Rhetoric: Silence as Thesis and the Limits of Negation
The exhibition’s title asserts a paradox; silence operates as the central theoretical instrument. Charcoal, with its capacity for both mark and erasure, is well suited to enact such paradoxes. Yet the show treats silence predominantly as an ontological or poetic condition rather than as a produced social effect. Silence in socio-political contexts is generated by censorship, institutional omission, and structural violences. Adrao gestures toward these histories but seldom follows them into institutional or archival specificity.
When silence is aestheticized—rendered as aura in a well-lit gallery of well-crafted drawings—it risks sentimentalizing absence. The charcoal marks can feel like elegy rather than indictment. For silence to be more than atmosphere, the exhibition must translate aesthetic negation into named, situated claims.
---
Exhibition Objecthood and the Afterlife of Images
Charcoal drawings resist the slick reproducibility of photography, yet they are nonetheless circulated through photographic documentation, press, and social media. Unlike photographs, the drawings’ photographed reproductions flatten facture into textureless images that belie the medium’s labor. The show must account for this afterlife: how do these intensely hand-wrought objects behave once they are clipped into promotional grids and scrolling feeds?
If Adrao’s project aims for public consequence, the work needs mechanisms that survive distributive flattening—annotation, accessible programming, or documentation that preserves process rather than only product. Otherwise the draughtsmanship’s ethical claims risk being reduced to attractive content for consumption.
---
Power, Public Space, and Institutional Responsibility
A show concerned with silence should interrogate the museum that houses it. The Vargas Museum, as a university museum and public cultural node, mediates which narratives are displayed and which are obscured. Adrao’s charcoal works gesture at institutional critique but frequently stop short of implicating the museum as an active producer of silences. A rigorous practice would deploy the institution as interlocutor—through contested labeling, dialogic programming, or spatial interventions that expose institutional authority rather than merely using it as a stage.
The absence of this institutional reckoning in curatorial materials and programming is an important omission: silence cannot be convincingly performed without naming the architectures that produce it.
---
Conclusion: From Charcoal Gesture to Discursive Force
A Deafening Silence is materially and visually compelling precisely because charcoal asserts the artist’s hand and exposes processes of making, smudging, and erasure. Michael Adrao’s draughtsmanship and the exhibition’s spatial ambitions constitute a valuable contribution to contemporary practice. Yet the show too often allows formal mastery to stand in for discursive accountability. Charcoal’s eloquent marks deserve an equally rigorous apparatus of historical specificity, institutional interrogation, and programmatic activation.
This critique is an invitation: to preserve the tactile beauty of the drawings while deepening the exhibition’s claims—by anchoring floral motifs in material histories, by forcing the museum into acts of self-scrutiny, and by translating silence from atmospheric trope into named, contestable evidence. When beauty becomes proposition rather than solace, Adrao’s work will begin to justify its title—not as a decorative paradox, but as a civic demand that insists institutions answer for the silences they uphold.
Amiel Roldan’s curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
If you like my concept research, writing explorations, and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me
Amiel Gerald Roldan
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
If you like my works, concept, reflective research, writing explorations, and/or simple writings please support me by sending
me a coffee treat at GCash/GXI 09053027965 or http://paypal.me/AmielGeraldRoldan
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan: a multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, academic writing, and trauma-informed mythmaking. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and speculative cosmology, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical collaboration.
Comments