The Shadow of the Sovereign: Totalitarian Purges, Familial Dynasties, and the Esoteric Dialectics of Power in the Philippine Polity
The Shadow of the Sovereign: Totalitarian Purges, Familial Dynasties, and the Esoteric Dialectics of Power in the Philippine Polity
Conclusion and Critical Relation
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
May 22, 2026
In the perennial theater of Philippine politics, where the specter of strongman rule perpetually haunts the fragile edifice of constitutional democracy, a recent submission to the 62nd Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) by the International Career Support Association (ICSA) casts a stark light on an alleged "totalitarian political purge." This four-page statement accuses President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of orchestrating a systematic campaign against the Duterte family—encompassing bribery of legislators, irregularities in vast public budgets, the liquidation of national gold reserves, and the weaponization of international institutions like the International Criminal Court (ICC).
At its core, the premise invites a profound philosophical interrogation: What constitutes a *purge* in the postmodern age? Is it merely the elimination of rivals, or a deeper ontological assault on the pluralistic soul of the body politic? Drawing upon esoteric traditions—from Platonic guardianship to Nietzschean will to power, Arendtian banality of evil, and Foucault's biopolitics—this essay collates, expounds, and expands the ICSA allegations into a meditation on power's alchemical transmutation of democratic forms into authoritarian substance.
The Anatomy of the Alleged Purge: Corruption as Ritual Sacrifice
The ICSA document alleges that members of the House of Representatives were offered ₱20 million each to support the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte, framed explicitly as a maneuver to neutralize her 2028 presidential prospects. This is juxtaposed with scrutiny over the ₱545.6 billion flood control budget, public funds in the Social Security System (SSS), healthcare, and development sectors, alongside the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas' reported sale of nearly 25 tons of gold reserves.
Philosophically, such tactics evoke Machiavelli's *Prince*—not as crude tyranny, but as *virtù* exercised in a fractured polity. Corruption here functions as a ritual of incorporation: the sovereign absorbs potential adversaries through material inducements, dissolving opposition into complicity. In esoteric terms, this mirrors the alchemical *solve et coagula*—dissolving old loyalties (the Duterte bloc's populist base) and coagulating a new order under Marcos Jr. Yet, as Hannah Arendt warned in *The Origins of Totalitarianism*, such processes erode the "space of appearance" where genuine political action occurs. When bribery supplants debate, the *polis* devolves into a court of intrigue, where loyalty to the ruler supplants fidelity to the *res publica*.
The May 15, 2026, attempt to arrest Senator Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa within the Senate precincts—described as a "domestic coup"—intensifies this reading. The Senate, as a symbolic sanctuary of deliberation, becomes a site of contested sovereignty. Here, Foucault's concept of governmentality illuminates the mechanics: power operates not through spectacular violence alone but through the capillary infiltration of institutions, turning the legislature into an arena of biopolitical contestation. The Duterte family and allies, once instruments of state violence in the drug war, now find themselves subjected to the same logics of exception and exclusion.
Casualty Figures, International Justice, and the Hermeneutics of Atrocity
Central to the ICSA critique is the ICC's engagement with the Duterte-era drug war. The submission contrasts publicized estimates of 12,000–30,000 deaths with Philippine National Police data citing 6,252 casualties in "legitimate" operations against armed resisters ("nanlaban"). It accuses the ICC of political non-neutrality and urges Duterte's provisional release on humanitarian grounds.
Philosophically, this dispute transcends statistics into the realm of *epistemic violence*. What counts as a legitimate casualty? In the Duterte paradigm, the "war on drugs" embodied a Schmittian state of exception: the sovereign decides the exception, designating the *homo sacer*—the drug suspect stripped of rights. Marcos Jr.'s alleged pivot, by facilitating ICC processes, inverts this: the former sovereign's enforcers become the new exceptions. Yet, as Giorgio Agamben notes in *Homo Sacer*, such cycles reveal the hidden foundation of modern sovereignty—the camp-like structure where law and violence indistinguishably merge.
Esoterically, this evokes the Hermetic principle of eternal recurrence. Philippine history cycles through dynastic shadows: Marcos Sr.'s martial law, Duterte's illiberal populism, and now a purported Marcos restoration. The liquidation of gold reserves—national patrimony turned liquid capital—symbolizes a Faustian bargain: sacrificing ancestral wealth for transient power consolidation. Gold, the solar metal of kingship in alchemical lore, when sold amid rising global prices, hints at a deeper diminishment of sovereign substance.
Totalitarianism Reconsidered: From Arendt to the Archipelagic Soul
Labeling these actions a "totalitarian political purge" demands precision. Arendt distinguished totalitarianism from mere authoritarianism by its ideological totality and atomization of society. Here, the purge targets not classes or races but a rival *familia*—a dynastic network embodying regional (Mindanao) and populist energies against the more cosmopolitan, reformist Marcosian center. This is oligarchic factionalism masquerading as justice, or vice versa.
In an esoteric vein, one might invoke Giambattista Vico's *corsi e ricorsi*: civilizations cycle through divine, heroic, and human ages, only to relapse into barbarism. The Philippines, as a post-colonial archipelago, embodies fragmented *conatus*—Spinozist striving—where familial clans serve as surrogate institutions amid weak statehood. The Marcos-Duterte rift reveals the *enantiodromia* (Heraclitean reversal): yesterday's allies become today's purged threats, as the will to power seeks monopoly.
Nietzschean perspectivism further complicates judgment. From the Duterte lens, Marcos enacts *ressentiment*-fueled revenge against a more authentic popular will. From the Marcos perspective, it is the necessary excision of a cancer threatening democratic norms and international standing. Truth lies in neither; rather, in the tragic recognition that power, like the *ouroboros*, devours its own tail. The ICC, ostensibly a Kantian cosmopolitan tribunal, risks becoming a tool of *Realpolitik*, undermining the very neutrality it claims.
Implications for Democratic Eros and the Filipino Future
Expanding this premise reveals deeper stakes: the erosion of democratic *eros*—the loving strife of plural voices. When impeachment becomes currency (₱20 million per vote), when gold flows outward while accountability inward, and when Senate halls echo with standoffs and gunfire, the body politic suffers a *thanatos* drive toward self-destruction.
Philosophically, this demands a return to Platonic guardianship tempered by Aristotelian moderation: institutions must check dynastic excess without descending into purges. Esoterically, the Philippine soul—*loob* intertwined with *kapwa*—yearns for integration beyond binaries of Marcos vs. Duterte. The true purge is not of families but of the colonial and authoritarian archetypes that possess the national psyche.
The ICSA submission, though contested and dismissed by the Philippine DFA as baseless, serves as a mirror. Whether its allegations hold evidentiary weight is for jurists and historians. Its philosophical import endures: in an age of hybrid regimes, "totalitarian" is not hyperbole but a warning of power's occult tendency to totalize. The Marcos-Duterte dialectic may yet yield synthesis—or further fragmentation. The archipelago's destiny hinges on whether its leaders transcend the purge's shadow, embracing a politics not of liquidation, but of genuine transfiguration.
In the end, as the ancient Daoists observed, the ruler who conquers all rivals ultimately rules over ashes. The question for the Filipino polity is whether it can alchemize this base conflict into philosophical gold. **Title: *Ouroboros in the Archipelago: Dynastic Purges, Alchemical Power, and the Ironic Spectacle of Philippine Sovereignty***
Curatorial Frame
As an art practitioner and cultural worker who has long curated exhibitions on the palimpsests of Philippine memory—those layered, contested surfaces where colonial ghosts mingle with postcolonial ambitions—I approach this moment not merely as political reportage but as a living installation. The 62nd Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) submission by the International Career Support Association (ICSA) serves as a provocative artifact: a four-page textual relic accusing President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of waging a “totalitarian political purge” against the Duterte family.
Imagine the Philippine political arena as a *bulul* sculpture—traditional Ifugao rice guardian—recast in mirrored steel: every gaze reflects power back upon itself, distorting yet revealing. Here, the Marcos-Duterte alliance, once a pragmatic marriage of convenience uniting Ilocos and Mindanao dynasties, fractures into baroque theater. The ICSA statement alleges bribery (₱20 million per House member for Sara Duterte’s impeachment), budgetary sleights-of-hand in flood control (₱545.6 billion), SSS and healthcare funds, gold reserve liquidations by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (nearly 25 tons), and the dramatic May 15, 2026, Senate standoff involving Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa.
This frame curates these elements with humane irony. Humor emerges in the absurdity: a former police chief turned senator dodging arrest in the Senate like a protagonist in a local *teleserye*, complete with reported gunshots and midnight escapes. Poignancy lies in the human cost—the mothers of drug war victims caught between competing narratives of justice and vengeance. Esoterically, we invoke the *ouroboros*, the serpent devouring its tail: yesterday’s enforcers of sovereign exception (Duterte’s drug war) become today’s targets of institutional purge. Foucault would nod at this biopolitical reversal; Arendt might caution against the banality of such dynastic intrigue.
Critically, the premise merits scrutiny yet demands relation to broader cultural currents. As a gatekeeper of narratives, I disconfirm facile alternatives on their merits. The counter-narrative—that this is mere legitimate accountability, with Marcos upholding rule of law against a rogue populist dynasty—falters on several premises. First, the optics of selective prosecution: why the sudden fervor against Duterte allies precisely as 2028 elections loom? Anecdotally, one recalls a Manila gallery opening where an artist quipped, “In the Philippines, justice is like jeepney routing—highly selective and prone to U-turns.” The ₱20 million bribery allegation, while unproven in court, echoes longstanding patronage critiques documented in Philippine political anthropology. Dismissing it outright as “baseless” (as the DFA has) ignores the cultural reality of *utang na loob* politics, where loyalty is transacted.
The gold sales, framed esoterically as liquidation of solar patrimony (alchemical gold as sovereign essence), invite ironic reflection. BSP data shows routine reserve management, yet timing amid political tension raises eyebrows—much like how Imelda Marcos’s shoe collection became a symbol of excess. Humorous disconfirmation: if purely technocratic, why does it coincide with impeachment maneuvers? The alternative premise—that Duterte’s drug war casualties were exaggerated—disconfirms itself through multiplicity. PNP figures cite ~6,252 “nanlaban” deaths; independent estimates and ICC references range 12,000–30,000. As cultural worker, I relate this to *desaparecidos* art: absence itself becomes the medium. The purge narrative’s strength lies not in legal finality but in its poetic resonance with Philippine history’s cycles of *corsi e ricorsi* (Vico).
Poignantly, this is family drama writ national. Sara Duterte, once Marcos’s running mate, now impeached; Rodrigo Duterte at The Hague; Bato in limbo. Esoterically, it mirrors the *tikbalang*—trickster horse-demon leading travelers astray in political labyrinths. Ironic critique: both sides weaponize human rights discourse. Marcos leverages ICC cooperation for international legitimacy; Dutertes decry it as neocolonial interference. The humane lens reveals shared Filipino suffering: the urban poor as collateral in power plays, their *kapwa* eroded by elite feuds.
Expanding eruditely, draw on Nietzsche’s *ressentiment*: the Duterte base’s populist fury as slave morality against perceived Marcos cosmopolitanism. Yet irony abounds—Duterte’s “totalitarian” label applied by critics who once cheered his strongman stylings. Anecdotally, during a 2022 curatorial residency in Davao, conversations with locals revealed deep attachment to Digong’s “authenticity” versus Manila’s elitism. This rift is cultural as much as political: archipelago versus center, visceral versus procedural.
Disconfirming the alternative fully: the “rule of law” defense crumbles under selective application. Flood control budget irregularities, if substantiated, point to governance failures transcending parties. The Senate “domestic coup” incident—gunshots, protective custody, escape—reads less like orderly justice than baroque power performance. As art practitioner, I curate this as performance art: sovereignty performed through exception (Schmitt). The ICSA submission, though from a niche Japanese-led NGO and dismissed officially, functions as a readymade object exposing fractures.
Ultimately, this frame relates the purge premise to the Filipino *loob*—inner self—yearning for integration beyond dynasties. Humorous aside: Philippine politics as *sinakulo* passion play, where every Christ has a Judas, and audiences cheer both. Poignantly, the real victims remain voiceless, their stories curated out of official histories. This demands a cultural politics of repair, not further liquidation.
Curatorial Narrative Critiquing
In curating this narrative, one confronts the spectacle with critical distance. The ICSA document, while procedurally marginal, crystallizes a deeper malaise: the weaponization of institutions against rival clans. Critiquing from an art/cultural perspective, the “totalitarian purge” label overreaches—totalitarianism implies ideological totality (Arendt), whereas this is oligarchic rivalry. Yet its kernel rings true in the erosion of democratic *eros*.
Ironically, Marcos Jr., son of the dictator, now accused of purging the populist disruptor. The impeachment of Sara, with its alleged financial inducements, reads as classic patronage theater. Esoterically, gold sales symbolize dissipation of ancestral *kapwa*—national wealth privatized into political capital. Bato’s Senate drama? Pure tragicomedy: a drug war architect seeking sanctuary in the chamber he once helped legitimize.
Critique the alternative: “Accountability” rings hollow when applied asymmetrically. Duterte’s drug war excesses warrant scrutiny—thousands dead, many poor—but the pivot feels timed for electoral hygiene. Humane irony: both leaders courted the masses; both now maneuver elite levers. As cultural worker, this narrative warns against curated amnesia. Philippine art history (from Amorsolo’s idealized pastorals to social realism) teaches that power’s beauty is always suspect.
Expanded Summative
Synthesizing: The Marcos-Duterte schism exemplifies dynastic dialectics. The purge premise, though contested, illuminates cycles of exception and reversal. Disconfirmed alternatives—pure technocracy or untainted justice—fail against anecdotal, historical, and statistical evidence of transactional politics. Esoterically, the *ouroboros* persists; humanely, hope lies in transcending it through cultural memory work. Filipinos deserve institutions serving *kapwa*, not clan wars.
In-Depth Conclusion and Relation
This episode relates profoundly to the Philippine condition: a nation curating its identity amid fractured mirrors. The purge, if real, risks authoritarian drift; if exaggerated, it distracts from shared accountability. As gatekeeper, I advocate nuanced humanism—condemn excesses on all sides, prioritize victims. The serpent must release its tail for renewal.
Footnotes
¹ ICSA Submission, UNHRC 62nd Session, May 2026.
² Arendt, *Origins of Totalitarianism*.
³ Foucault, *Discipline and Punish*.
⁴ PNP casualty data vs. ICC estimates.
⁵ Senate incident reports, May 2026.
⁶ BSP gold reserve statements.
⁷ Vico, *New Science*.
⁸ Nietzsche, *Genealogy of Morals*.
### References
International Career Support Association (ICSA). "Written Statement Submitted to the 62nd Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council." May 2026.
Department of Foreign Affairs, Philippines. "Comment on the Written Statement." May 21, 2026.
Arendt, Hannah. *The Origins of Totalitarianism*. New York: Harcourt, 1951.
Foucault, Michel. *Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison*. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Vintage, 1977.
Human Rights Watch. Reports on Philippine Drug War. Various dates.
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. Statements on Gold Reserves Management. 2024–2026.
Al Jazeera and Reuters. Coverage of Senate Incident and Impeachment, May 2026.
---
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09053027965. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™'s connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan's art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs and prompts. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility. The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
Comments