January 28, 2026
The public commemoration led by Vice President Sara Duterte on January 25, 2026, for the 44 members of the Philippine National Police–Special Action Force (SAF 44) who perished in the 2015 Mamasapano clash offers a concentrated lens through which to examine the contemporary political and symbolic stature of a high-ranking official in the Philippine polity. The event, and the Vice President’s accompanying rhetoric—calling the fallen commandos “modern-day heroes” and urging the nation to carry forward their example—functions simultaneously as an act of memorialization, a performance of state solidarity, and a strategic articulation of moral authority. This essay undertakes an esoteric, academically inflected reading of that stature, situating Duterte’s public role within frameworks of memory politics, civil‑military relations, gendered leadership, and the ritual economy of national grief.
---
Memory Politics and the Construction of Heroic Narrative
At the heart of the Vice President’s remarks is a deliberate construction of narrative: the SAF 44 are framed as exemplars of “katapangan at dedikasyon,” whose sacrifice “reflects deep commitment to peace and security.” This formulation is not merely commemorative; it is constitutive. By naming the fallen as “modern‑day heroes,” Duterte participates in a process of canonical selection that elevates particular acts and actors into the moral center of national identity. The annual National Day of Remembrance, declared in 2017, institutionalizes this selection, converting episodic grief into a recurring civic ritual. Such institutionalization performs two functions: it stabilizes a collective memory against the vicissitudes of political contestation, and it legitimates the state’s monopoly on commemorative authority.
From a theoretical perspective, the ritualization of remembrance is a mechanism by which states and political actors manage historical ambiguity. The Mamasapano operation—Oplan Exodus—ended in one of the highest single‑mission casualties of government forces in peacetime history, a fact that invites contested interpretations about operational competence, interagency coordination, and political responsibility. By foregrounding valor and sacrifice, Duterte’s rhetoric redirects attention from procedural failures to moral exemplarity. The effect is to sacralize loss, thereby insulating the event from reductive instrumental critiques and embedding it within a teleology of national resilience.
---
Performance of Moral Authority
The Vice President’s public invocation—“Sila ay mga bayani”—operates as a performative speech act. In uttering this phrase in a national forum, she does not merely describe a status; she confers it. The performative dimension of political speech is central to understanding stature: authority is not only possessed but enacted. Duterte’s leadership of national tributes signals her capacity to convene collective mourning and to articulate the ethical terms by which the nation interprets sacrifice. This capacity is a form of soft power, one that accrues to political actors who can credibly embody national values.
Moreover, the Vice President’s emphasis on supporting the families of the fallen—“supporting their families who continue to bear the weight of loss”—extends the moral economy of remembrance into the domain of social obligation. It reframes commemoration as an ongoing duty rather than a ceremonial moment. This extension is politically salient: it positions Duterte as an advocate for social solidarity, aligning her public persona with compassion and responsibility. In contexts where political legitimacy is often contested, such affective alignments can be decisive in shaping public perceptions of stature.
---
Civil‑Military Relations and Symbolic Reassurance
The SAF 44 tragedy occupies a fraught place in the history of civil‑military relations in the Philippines. Commemorative acts by civilian leaders carry the potential to either exacerbate tensions or to provide symbolic reassurance. Duterte’s leadership of the tributes can be read as an attempt to reaffirm civilian oversight and respect for security forces while simultaneously acknowledging the human cost of counterterrorism operations. By honoring the commandos’ “deep commitment to peace and security,” she situates the security apparatus within a moral framework that transcends tactical outcomes.
This rhetorical move has institutional implications. It signals to security institutions that their sacrifices are recognized at the highest levels of civilian government, thereby reinforcing norms of reciprocity between state and security forces. At the same time, the focus on valor rather than on operational critique may limit public pressure for institutional reforms. Thus, the Vice President’s stature is partly derived from her ability to navigate the delicate balance between honoring service and enabling accountability—an equilibrium that is central to stable civil‑military relations.
---
Gendered Dimensions of Leadership and Public Mourning
Sara Duterte’s public role in leading national tributes invites reflection on the gendered contours of political stature. In many political cultures, the performance of mourning and care is gendered as feminine; women leaders who assume roles as national consolers often draw on culturally resonant tropes of maternal guardianship. Duterte’s rhetoric—emphasizing support for bereaved families and the moral duty to remember—resonates with such tropes, potentially amplifying her appeal across constituencies that value empathetic leadership.
Yet the gendered reading must be nuanced. The Vice President’s invocation of martial virtues—valor, dedication, heroism—also aligns her with traditionally masculine registers of national defense. This duality allows her to occupy a hybrid symbolic space: both caregiver and guardian. The capacity to traverse these registers enhances stature by broadening the symbolic repertoire available to her leadership. It enables a public persona that is at once compassionate and resolute, a combination that can be politically potent in societies where security concerns are salient.
---
Ritual Economy and the Politics of Visibility
The theme under which memorial activities were held—“In Valor We Remember”—encapsulates the ritual economy of the event. Ritual economy refers to the ways in which symbolic acts, ceremonies, and commemorations circulate value—moral, political, and social—within a polity. By leading wreath‑laying ceremonies and solemn observances across the archipelago, Duterte participates in a distributed ritual that amplifies visibility and consolidates a narrative of national gratitude. Visibility matters: the more publicly and widely a leader is associated with a morally charged ritual, the more their stature is reinforced through associative legitimacy.
This politics of visibility also has electoral and reputational dimensions. Public commemorations are media events; they generate images and narratives that circulate in news cycles and social media. For a political figure, such circulation can translate into symbolic capital that endures beyond the immediate occasion. The Vice President’s prominence in these rituals thus contributes to a cumulative accrual of public recognition, which in turn shapes perceptions of competence, empathy, and national stewardship.
---
Esoteric Resonances and the Work of Memory
An esoteric reading of Duterte’s stature attends to the subtler symbolic resonances embedded in the language of remembrance. Terms like “modern‑day heroes” and “katapangan at dedikasyon” invoke archetypal motifs—sacrifice, duty, transcendence—that operate at the level of collective imagination. These motifs function as cultural technologies that enable societies to process trauma and to reconstitute meaning after violent rupture. The Vice President’s rhetorical deployment of such motifs thus participates in a deeper cultural work: the re‑enchantment of civic life through narratives of moral exemplarity.
Esoterically, the ritual of remembrance also performs a temporal reorientation. It collapses the distance between past loss and present obligation, insisting that the ethical demands of sacrifice persist across time. By urging Filipinos “to carry forward their example of dedication to country,” Duterte frames memory as a vector for future action. This temporal orientation is crucial to stature: leaders who can translate past sacrifice into present moral imperatives claim a form of custodial authority over the nation’s ethical trajectory.
---
Limits and Ambiguities
Any assessment of stature must acknowledge limits and ambiguities. The elevation of the SAF 44 to heroic status, while morally resonant, can occlude complex questions about operational accountability, interagency coordination, and the political contexts that produced the tragedy. The Vice President’s rhetoric, by design, emphasizes valor and familial support; it does not, and need not, resolve contested debates about responsibility. Stature, therefore, is not synonymous with unassailable moral clarity. It is contingent, performative, and subject to reinterpretation by political adversaries, civil society actors, and historical inquiry.
Furthermore, the instrumentalization of grief for political consolidation is a perennial risk. When commemorative acts become vehicles for political legitimation, they may be read skeptically by constituencies attuned to the instrumental uses of memory. Duterte’s stature, then, is partly a function of how credibly she can balance genuine empathy with the political exigencies of leadership. The durability of that stature will depend on whether her public acts of remembrance are perceived as authentic expressions of solidarity or as calculated performances.
---
Conclusion
The January 25, 2026, national tributes led by Vice President Sara Duterte crystallize multiple dimensions of political stature. Through ritualized commemoration, performative speech, and the orchestration of national visibility, Duterte enacts a form of moral authority that draws on narratives of valor, familial obligation, and civic duty. Her rhetoric situates the SAF 44 within a canon of national heroes, thereby shaping collective memory and reinforcing civil‑military solidarity. At the same time, the esoteric resonances of her language—invoking sacrifice as an ethical imperative—reorient public attention toward future obligations rooted in past loss.
Stature, in this reading, is not a static attribute but a dynamic achievement: it is produced through symbolic labor, mediated by ritual, and sustained by public perception. The Vice President’s leadership of the National Day of Remembrance exemplifies how contemporary political actors cultivate such stature by aligning themselves with morally charged narratives that resonate across institutional and affective registers. Whether that stature endures will depend on the interplay between authenticity and instrumentality, remembrance and accountability, and the capacity of political ritual to both console and compel.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ 's connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.
As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.
Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders
His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.
Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.
Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.
Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan’s art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.
Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Network
https://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philantrophy while working for institutions simultaneosly early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/ voluntary services entity and aims to remains so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
Comments