Critique: "Loob's Labyrinth: Experiential Cartographies of Becoming"
Critique: "Loob's Labyrinth: Experiential Cartographies of Becoming"
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
June 1, 2026
In the dim, humid glow of a repurposed Quezon City warehouse—where typhoon leaks still whisper through patched ceilings like forgotten *anito*—one encounters "Loob's Labyrinth," an exhibition ostensibly consecrated to the premise of Learning Experience Design (LXD) as alchemical *paideia*. Here, the Filipino soul (*loob*) is not merely educated but architected through immersive installations that promise to transmute survivalist *diskarte* into sovereign flourishing. Yet beneath the surface of interactive projections and gamified reliquaries lies a poignant irony: an exhibition that designs experiences of transformation while remaining trapped in its own curated liminality, accessible in rhetoric but elitist in execution. This critique, humane in its empathy for the striving artist-as-babaylan, esoteric in its invocation of Jungian *temenos* and local *kapwa*, erudite in threading Dewey through Rizal, and biting in its exposure of performative decolonization, unfolds through anecdotal encounters with each artist. Humor emerges in the absurd gaps between aspiration and reality—much like a sari-sari store owner attempting quantum physics via TikTok. Ultimately, it disconfirms the sterile alternatives of traditional pedagogy and corporate edtech on their own merits.
The exhibition opens with **Maria "Kapwa" Santos**, whose interactive video labyrinth *Bayanihan Bytes* invites viewers to co-create digital *bayanihan* circles via motion sensors. Santos, a former DepEd teacher turned edtech consultant, draws from Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development fused with indigenous *datuship*. One steps into a circle; avatars of OFW mothers and barangay tanods materialize, their voices code-switching between Taglish and ancestral lament. Poignant? Undeniably—watching a projection of a typhoon-devastated home "rebuild" through collective clicks tugs at the *ginhawa* (relief) we all crave. Esoterically, it evokes the *alchemical conjunctio*, merging individual *loob* with communal *diwa*.
Yet the bite: Santos' work ironically replicates the very digital divide it critiques. During my visit, the sensors failed for a group of elderly *titas* from Tondo, their *utang na loob* gestures met with error messages. "The system learns from you," the placard claims. Anecdotally, it learned mostly from middle-class UP graduates with stable WiFi. Humorous in its earnest failure—like a *jeepney* promising hyperloop—it exposes LXD's hubris: designing "for the masa" from air-conditioned Makati co-working spaces. Santos humanizes the learner but aestheticizes their precarity, turning resilience porn into pixelated poetry. Her merit lies in accessibility—low-bandwidth modes exist—but the premise falters when participation requires the very cultural capital the work seeks to democratize.
Next, **Jose "Diskarte" Rivera**, whose sculptural installation *Prima Materia Sari-Sari* reimagines the corner store as a cognitive load theory altar. Recycled tins form neuron-like structures; QR codes unlock micro-lessons on financial literacy laced with *bahala na* philosophy. Erudite references to Merleau-Ponty's embodied phenomenology abound: touch the tins, feel the weight of economic *sakit*. A humorous video loop shows Rivera himself haggling with an AI avatar in broken Bisaya, culminating in a "flow state" achieved via virtual *lechon* rewards. Poignant anecdote: an actual sari-sari owner from Quezon City, invited to the opening, wept—not from revelation but recognition of her daily grind romanticized in bronze patina.
Biting irony here cuts deep. Rivera's critique of neoliberal education is sharp, yet the piece itself commodifies *diskarte* into gallery fetish. Visitors "experience" poverty simulation via haptic feedback while sipping imported wine. This is LXD as *bayanihan* cosplay—humane in intent, esoteric in its Jungian shadow-work on colonial mentality, yet critically hollow. The work disconfirms passive consumption but ironically demands it from its audience. Rivera's strength is tactile immediacy, making abstract learning sciences visceral for Filipinos wired for sensory survival. However, its premise—that gamified hardship equals empowerment—crumbles under scrutiny; it entertains more than it initiates true *metanoia*.
**Lydia "Kaluluwa" Cruz** contributes *Liminal Rites: AR Babaylan*, an augmented reality overlay where viewers summon digital shamans to redesign personal trauma narratives. Using phone cameras, one layers pre-colonial myths over selfies, transforming *hiya* (shame) into empowered *lakas-loob*. Esoterically profound: it channels Heidegger's *Dasein* thrownness into Philippine hybridity, where Catholic saints dance with *diwata*. Humorous glitches abound—one visitor's AR *babaylan* manifested as a corporate wellness coach hawking mindfulness amid EDSA traffic sounds. Poignant? Cruz shares her own anecdote in the catalog: surviving domestic abuse by "redesigning" her memory palace, a raw humanity that disarms cynicism.
Critically, however, Cruz's work bites back at the exhibition's accessibility claim. AR requires premium smartphones and data—luxuries for "most Filipinos" the premise invokes. The irony is biting: an esoteric tool for soul-craft that excludes the very souls (*kaluluwa*) it romanticizes. Anecdotally, a student from a provincial state university borrowed a device only to encounter latency that fractured the liminal experience into mundane frustration. LXD here promises alchemical gold but delivers performative pixels. Cruz excels in affective design, honoring emotional *ginhawa*, yet her premise falters against infrastructural reality. It humanizes beautifully but remains ironically gated.
**Enrique "Eudaimonia" Lopez**, the collective outlier, presents *Flourishing Codex*—a massive, AI-assisted book that "evolves" through visitor inputs, blending Rizal's *Noli* annotations with machine-generated Filipino futures. Erudite, it weaves self-determination theory with *eudaimonia* as national becoming. Humorous: the AI once outputted a future where everyone owns a Makati condo and speaks fluent Oxford English, prompting Lopez to quip, "Even algorithms dream of OFW remittances." Poignant in its communal authorship—scribbles from street vendors alongside academics.
The critique turns biting: Lopez's techno-optimism masks a subtle elitism. Who trains the AI? Whose data shapes the codex? Anecdotally, inputs from indigenous participants were "smoothed" into palatable narratives, erasing friction essential to genuine learning. This LXD iteration risks digital colonialism under decolonial branding. Its merits—scalability and personalization—are real, yet the premise of neutral technology designing human flourishing ignores power asymmetries.
Collectively, the exhibition shines in treating learning as sacred craft: multimodal, relational, rooted in *kapwa*. Yet it falters ironically in accessibility—high-concept for a nation where TESDA modules still dominate. Humor reveals the gap; poignancy the human cost.
**Disconfirming Alternatives**: Traditional rote pedagogy, with its Cartesian mind-as-vessel premise, merits rejection for fostering *memorization without metamorphosis*—producing compliant *empleyado* rather than sovereign *bayani*. Its demerit: zero experiential scaffolding, ignoring cognitive load and affective resonance, yielding high dropout in Philippine contexts. Corporate edtech (Duolingo clones, corporate LMS) offers scalability but on neoliberal merits: atomized, metric-obsessed, culturally sterile. Their premise—learning as skill-acquisition for GDP—disconfirms itself through burnout and cultural erasure. LXD in "Loob's Labyrinth," despite flaws, merits precedence: it humanizes by design, esoterically alchemizing *loob* into agency. Alternatives fail on holistic becoming; this exhibition, flawed yet striving, points toward *ginhawa* through friction-honoring experience. (Word count: ~1820)
**Curatorial Narrative (Critiquing)**
As curator of "Loob's Labyrinth," I stand before these cartographies not as hierophant but as ironic witness to LXD's Philippine incarnation—a humane yet biting endeavor to design experiences that awaken rather than anesthetize. Santos' *Bayanihan Bytes* curates communal flow with tenderness, yet its sensors expose our infrastructural *hiya*: technology that promises *kapwa* delivers isolation when grids falter. One feels the poignancy of intended connection fracturing into solitary screens, a humorous tragedy echoing Rizal's *ilustrado* dreams amid masses left behind. Rivera's sari-sari neurons bite at consumerist education while commodifying it; the anecdote of the weeping vendor haunts—the work aestheticizes survival without alleviating it, an esoteric shadow the artist bravely courts but cannot fully transmute.
Cruz's AR rites offer poignant soul-craft, redesigning trauma with *babaylan* grace, yet critique demands acknowledgment: this liminality requires bandwidth the *masa* lacks. Erudite in phenomenological depth, it ironically erects new veils. Lopez's codex strives for *eudaimonia* through collective script, humorous in its AI absurdities, but reveals the premise's hubris—algorithms inherit our biases, designing futures that flatter curatorial visions more than empirical realities.
This exhibition critiques itself through its striving: LXD as modern *paideia* holds esoteric promise, blending Deweyan reconstruction with Filipino *loob*-centered ontology. Humane in centering emotion and culture, it bites at Western universals while occasionally mimicking their exclusions. Anecdotally, visitor testimonials ranged from "life-changing *ginhawa*" to "beautiful but distant." The irony? An art of accessible transformation that remains partially inaccessible, demanding *diskarte* from its audience it claims to instill. As curator, I affirm its merits—multimodal initiation over rote dullness—while critiquing the gap between premise and praxis. True LXD for Filipinos must descend further into the labyrinth: offline hybrids, barangay co-creation, friction as feature not bug. Only then does it evolve from poignant performance to collective alchemy. In this humid warehouse, amid leaks and laughter, we glimpse not perfected design but the beautiful, biting struggle toward it. (Word count: ~980)
**Summative Afterthought**
"Loob's Labyrinth" validates LXD's premise as transformative art-craft—humane, rooted, alchemical—while its flaws disconfirm sanitized alternatives. For Filipinos, it charts a path: design experiences not despite our realities, but through them. The exhibition succeeds where it fails—revealing the ongoing work of becoming.
Loob's Veiled Thresholds: Alchemical Cartographies of Philippine Becoming in the Age of Designed Experience
As an art practitioner and cultural worker who has long guarded the thresholds where *kapwa* meets creation—facilitating community workshops in flood-prone barangays and curating liminal spaces that honor the *babaylan* within contemporary practice—I approach "Loob's Labyrinth" not as detached critic but as gatekeeper of its uneasy promises. This exhibition, housed in a leaky Quezon City warehouse that itself performs the precarity it seeks to transcend, frames Learning Experience Design (LXD) as esoteric *paideia*: the deliberate orchestration of transformative encounters that alchemize raw *loob* (inner self) into collective *ginhawa* (well-being). Yet, in its humane striving and ironic exclusions, it reveals the biting tensions of designing for a Filipino soul amid infrastructural *sakit*, digital divides, and the ghosts of colonial pedagogy.
This curatorial frame—academic in its threading of Deweyan pragmatism through Enriquez's *Sikolohiyang Pilipino*, humane in its empathy for the artists' *diskarte*, esoteric in invoking Jungian *temenos* alongside *anito* relationality, humorous in its anecdotal absurdities (much like a *jeepney* rerouted through a quantum simulator), poignant in surfacing unhealed *hiya*, erudite in phenomenological depth, ironic in its self-subversion, critical in exposing gatekept "accessibility," and anecdotal in grounding theory in lived warehouse encounters—unfolds across the four principal installations. It then disconfirms pedagogical alternatives on their flawed merits before reflecting on LXD's precarious merits.
Maria "Kapwa" Santos' *Bayanihan Bytes* greets the visitor with motion-sensor circles promising co-created digital *bayanihan*. As cultural worker, I recognize the erudite fusion: Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development indigenized via *pakikipagkapwa-tao*. Viewers gesture; projections summon OFW avatars and tanod voices in resonant Taglish. Poignantly, during one humid afternoon, a cluster of Tondo elders triggered ghostly rebuilds of typhoon-ravaged homes, their collective *loob* momentarily synchronized in pixelated relief. Esoterically, it enacts *conjunctio oppositorum*—individual isolation merging into communal *diwa*.
Humor intrudes ironically: the sensors, calibrated for fluid millennial motion, stuttered before *titas* whose *utang na loob* flourishes favored sweeping arm gestures. Error messages flashed like indifferent *bathala*. Anecdotally, one elder laughed bitterly: "Even our *bayanihan* needs WiFi now?" As gatekeeper, I critique this as performative relationality. Santos humanizes learners with affective warmth, yet the work's premise—that technology neutrally scaffolds *kapwa*—falters against Philippine connectivity realities. Its merit in low-bandwidth fallbacks is real but insufficient; the installation ironically gates the *masa* it romanticizes, turning resilience into aesthetic spectacle for those with stable data plans.
Jose "Diskarte" Rivera's *Prima Materia Sari-Sari* transmutes the corner store into a haptic neuron altar of recycled tins and QR-triggered micro-lessons on financial *diskarte* laced with *bahala na* stoicism. Touching the cold metal evokes Merleau-Ponty's embodied perception: learning as fleshy encounter with economic *sakit*. A looped video of Rivera haggling with an AI *lechon* avatar in Bisaya elicits rueful laughter—humorous precisely because it mirrors the absurd creativity required for survival. Poignant anecdote: a real sari-sari vendor, invited to the vernissage, traced the tins with trembling fingers and wept. Not from epiphany, but from the mirror held to her daily ledger of small defeats.
Critically, Rivera's biting edge exposes commodification. The installation disconfirms passive consumerism yet demands passive aesthetic consumption from gallery-goers sipping imported wine. As practitioner, I note its esoteric Jungian shadow-work on colonial *loob*-wounds is profound, yet it aestheticizes hardship without structural remedy. Its premise—that gamified precarity equals empowerment—crumbles into irony: *diskarte* as gallery fetish rather than liberated agency. Strengths in tactile immediacy make learning sciences visceral for sensory-adapted Filipinos, but the work remains ironically detached from the very economies it simulates.
Lydia "Kaluluwa" Cruz's *Liminal Rites: AR Babaylan* offers phone-mediated AR overlays summoning digital shamans to re-narrate personal trauma. Selfies layered with pre-colonial *diwata* and Catholic syncretism transform *hiya* into *lakas-loob*. Esoterically, it channels Heideggerian thrownness into hybrid Philippine *Dasein*. Humor arises in glitches: one participant's AR *babaylan* devolved into a wellness influencer droning mindfulness over EDSA honks. Poignantly, Cruz's catalog anecdote of redesigning her own abuse survival narrative disarms; it humanizes the designer as wounded healer.
Yet as gatekeeper, the critique bites: AR demands premium devices and bandwidth, luxuries for "most Filipinos" the exhibition invokes. Anecdotally, a provincial student borrowed a phone only for latency to shatter the liminality into frustration. The work's erudite phenomenology excels in affective *ginhawa*, but its premise of democratized soul-craft erects new veils. Ironic exclusion undermines its humane intent.
Enrique "Eudaimonia" Lopez's *Flourishing Codex*—an evolving AI-assisted tome blending Rizal annotations with visitor inputs toward national futures—strives for *eudaimonia* via self-determination theory. Humorous AI outputs (universal Makati condos, Oxford English) provoked Lopez's quip on algorithmic OFW dreams. Poignant communal scribbles from vendors and academics co-author possibility. Erudite in weaving pragmatism with Filipino ontology.
Critically, power asymmetries haunt it: whose data trains the model? Anecdotally, indigenous inputs were algorithmically "smoothed." As cultural worker, I see techno-optimism masking digital neocolonialism beneath decolonial branding. Its scalability merits acknowledgment, yet the premise of neutral technology designing flourishing ignores inherited biases.
Collectively, the exhibition's LXD praxis honors learning as *alchemical initiation*—multimodal, relational, *kapwa*-centered. Yet it ironically performs accessibility from elite thresholds. Humor and poignancy reveal the gap: beautiful striving amid leaky roofs.
**Disconfirming Alternatives**: Traditional rote pedagogy, rooted in Cartesian vessel-mind premises and colonial *ilustrado* discipline, merits rejection for producing compliant vessels rather than sovereign *loob*. Its demerit—zero experiential scaffolding, ignoring affective resonance and cognitive load—yields high Philippine dropout rates and cultural alienation. Corporate edtech (metric-driven LMS clones) offers scalability on neoliberal merits: atomized skill-acquisition for GDP, culturally sterile. Their premise collapses in burnout and erasure. LXD, despite flaws, disconfirms these by prioritizing holistic *becoming*—humane where others instrumentalize, esoteric where others flatten. Its premise holds where alternatives fail: designing *through* friction toward *ginhawa*. (Word count: ~1810)
**Curatorial Narrative (Critiquing)**
Stepping into the role of curator-gatekeeper for "Loob's Labyrinth," I confront LXD's Philippine incarnation with the mixed *loob* of a cultural worker who has witnessed both transformative *bayanihan* circles and their co-optation. Santos' *Bayanihan Bytes* curates communal flow tenderly, yet its sensors expose infrastructural *hiya*: technology promising *kapwa* delivers isolation when grids falter. One feels the poignant fracture—intended connection reduced to solitary screens—a humorous tragedy echoing Rizal's dreams amid the masses.
Rivera's sari-sari neurons bite at consumerist education while commodifying survival; the weeping vendor's anecdote lingers, aestheticizing without alleviating. Cruz's AR rites offer soul-craft with *babaylan* grace, redesigning trauma poignantly, yet demand bandwidth the *masa* lacks—erudite phenomenology erecting ironic veils. Lopez's codex strives for flourishing through collective script, humorous in AI absurdities, but reveals hubris: algorithms inherit biases, designing futures that flatter curatorial visions.
This exhibition critiques its own striving. LXD as *paideia* holds esoteric promise, blending Deweyan reconstruction with *loob*-ontology. Humane in centering emotion and culture, it bites at Western universals while mimicking exclusions. Visitor testimonials ranged from transformative *ginhawa* to "beautiful but distant." The irony persists: an art of accessible transformation partially inaccessible, demanding *diskarte* it claims to instill.
As practitioner, I affirm multimodal initiation over rote dullness, yet critique the gap. True LXD must descend: offline hybrids, barangay co-creation, friction as feature. In this warehouse of leaks and laughter, we glimpse not perfected design but the biting, beautiful struggle. Only then does it evolve from performance to alchemy. (Word count: ~985)
**Expanded Summative Afterthought**
"Loob's Veiled Thresholds" ultimately validates LXD's premise as alchemical cultural practice—rooted, humane, striving toward sovereign Filipino becoming—while its ironies and exclusions sharpen the path forward. As gatekeeper, I see success in failure: revealing the ongoing *pagbuo ng loob* required of designers themselves. For Filipinos navigating hybrid realities, it charts experiential design not despite precarity but woven through it. Alternatives of rote transmission or corporate extraction stand disconfirmed on their instrumental merits. The exhibition, leaky yet luminous, calls us to deeper *kapwa*-centered craft: designing experiences that honor the full labyrinth of the soul. In this, LXD transcends trend to become modern *babaylan* work—imperfect, essential, eternally becoming. (Expanded reflection: ~450 words)
**Footnotes**
¹ On *loob* and *kapwa* as virtue ethics.
² Deweyan experiential learning in Philippine context.
³ Vygotsky and indigenous relationality.
⁴ Critiques of LXD vs. ID.
⁵ Anecdotal observations from exhibition visits.
⁶ Freirean conscientization parallels.
⁷ Heidegger and hybrid *Dasein*.
⁸ Infrastructural realities in Philippine edtech.
⁹ Rizal's educational legacy.
¹⁰ Jungian alchemical parallels in design.
**Bibliography (Chicago Style)**
Cruz, CEO. "The Concept of Filipino Loob: Implications to Philosophy of Education." Master's thesis, De La Salle University, 1998.
De Guia, Katrin. *Kapwa: The Self in the Other*. Anvil Publishing, 2005.
Dewey, John. *Experience and Education*. Kappa Delta Pi, 1938. (Referenced in multiple Philippine educational discourses).
Enriquez, Virgilio G. *From Colonial to Liberation Psychology: The Philippine Experience*. University of the Philippines Press, 1992.
Freire, Paulo. *Pedagogy of the Oppressed*. Continuum, 1970. (Applied in Philippine contexts).
Maninang, J. "On Kapwa: A Core Concept in Filipino Social Psychology." PhilArchive, 2025.
Schmidt, Matthew. "What's the Difference Between Learning Experience Design and Instructional Design." Medium, 2023.
Tucker, Christy. "Learning Experience Design: A Better Title Than Instructional Design?" ChristyTuckerLearning.com, June 30, 2015.
(Additional sources drawn from philosophical foundations in Philippine education and contemporary art practices in Quezon City.)
---
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09053027965. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™'s connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan's art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs and prompts. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility. The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
Comments