Spectacle and Erasure: The Twin Crisis of Cultural Heritage and State Corruption in Indonesia and the Philippines
Burning the Archive: Art, Accumulation, and the Spectacle of Corruption in Southeast Asia
In the wake of recent revelations surrounding the Indonesian Prime Minister's private art holdings—many of which have been pillaged, torched, or quietly liquidated amid public outrage—we are confronted with a haunting image: contemporary art reduced to ash, not by accident, but by design. These were not mere decorative acquisitions. They were cultural assets amassed through state-backed investments, diverted public funds, and strategic co-optation of national collections. Their destruction, whether symbolic or literal, marks a violent rupture in the region's cultural memory—a spectacle of erasure masquerading as governance.
This moment demands reflection beyond Indonesia. It invites us to speculate, with urgency and precision, on the Philippine condition: a nation where contemporary art is surging in global demand, even as government officials engage in frantic accumulation, laundering, and misappropriation of development funds. What happens when the archive burns—not from neglect, but from the heat of political scandal and the desire to erase criticism?
I. Indonesia: The Art of Extraction
Indonesia's contemporary art scene has long been a site of resistance, nuance, and civic engagement. Yet under the current regime, cultural infrastructure has been hollowed out. Artist-run spaces shuttered. Heritage residences razed. Collections looted or destroyed. The Prime Minister's involvement—once framed as patronage—now appears as accumulation by extraction. State funds earmarked for preservation were rerouted to private vaults. Works that interrogated colonial violence, ecological collapse, and ethnic marginalization were quietly removed from public view.
The burning of these collections is not incidental. It is a strategic disavowal—a way to erase dissent, obscure provenance, and sever the public's relationship to its own cultural memory. In this context, art becomes both currency and casualty: a tool for laundering legitimacy, and a liability when legitimacy collapses.
II. The Philippine Parallel: Ghost Projects and Spectral Wealth
In the Philippines, the machinery of misappropriation is already in motion. The flood control scandal, which exposed billions lost to ghost infrastructure projects and congressional insertions, reveals a deeply entrenched culture of extraction. President Marcos Jr.'s call for transparency, while notable, has yet to yield structural accountability.
Simultaneously, Philippine contemporary art is experiencing a renaissance. Works rooted in trauma-informed critique, vernacular epistemologies, and speculative futures are gaining traction in biennales, auctions, and private collections. But this visibility comes with risk. Political elites—aware of art's investment potential—are acquiring works not for their cultural resonance, but as assets: vehicles for laundering, prestige, and soft power.
The irony is sharp. Art that critiques corruption is purchased by the corrupt. Paintings that mourn displacement hang in luxury condos built on displaced communities. The radical is aestheticized. The archive is privatized. And the public is left with spectacle.
III. Speculative Futures: What Might Burn
Let us imagine, with strategic clarity, a Philippine scenario mirroring Indonesia's collapse. Several high-ranking officials, having amassed a private collection of politically charged artworks, face public scrutiny over misused development funds. The artworks—acquired through shell corporations and state-backed cultural budgets—became symbols of betrayal. In a bid to erase evidence or quell dissent, these works are destroyed, hidden, or quietly sold off. The public, denied access to cultural memory, is left with ruins and rumors.
This is not dystopia. It is a plausible trajectory unless we intervene.
IV. Demand and Distribution: The Double-Edged Rise
The global appetite for Philippine contemporary art is real—and growing. But demand without ethical distribution risks dilution. Works are consumed but not understood. Admired but not engaged. Artists are caught between visibility and co-optation, survival and integrity.
We must rethink distribution—not as market expansion, but as ethical circulation. Who owns the archive? Who frames the narrative? Who benefits from the visibility?
V. Toward a Counter-Archive
In both Indonesia and the Philippines, the destruction of cultural heritage and the abuse of public wealth are not isolated crises. They are symptoms of a regional malaise where art is entangled with power, and memory is at risk. The task before us is not preservation for preservation's sake—but the construction of counter-archives: spaces where memory is dialogic, critique is sustained, and care is central.
This means:
- Transparency in acquisitions: Public collections must be protected from private laundering.
- Ethical framing: Artists must reclaim agency over how their works are interpreted and mobilized.
- Transnational solidarity: Indonesian and Filipino artists must build networks of resistance, share resources, and learn from each other's struggles.
- Strategic refusal: Refuse spectacle. Refuse co-optation. Refuse the archive as trophy.
VI. Conclusion: Art as Reckoning
If the archive burns, let it be a signal—not of defeat, but of the urgent need to rebuild with integrity. Art must remain a site of reckoning, not refuge. A tool for critique, not concealment. A proposition for collective transformation, not elite accumulation.
In this moment of crisis, we must ask: What kind of memory survives the fire? And who gets to tell its story?
---
An academic and reflective essay that weaves together the destruction of Indonesian contemporary art heritage, the parallel abuses of wealth and power in the Philippine context, and the paradoxical rise in demand for Philippine contemporary works:
---
Spectacle and Erasure: The Twin Crisis of Cultural Heritage and State Corruption in Indonesia and the Philippines
In recent years, Southeast Asia has witnessed a troubling convergence of cultural destruction and state-sponsored impunity. In Indonesia, the pillaging of contemporary art collections, heritage sites, and artist residences has escalated under the shadow of misappropriated government funds and public ridicule. This crisis is not merely a matter of lost artifacts or vandalized spaces—it is a violent unraveling of cultural memory, a strategic erasure of dissenting voices, and a symptom of deeper structural decay. Paralleling this is the Philippine condition, where government officials engage in frantic accumulation, laundering, and abuse of public wealth, even as Philippine contemporary art experiences a surge in global demand. The juxtaposition is stark: while artists labor to preserve memory and provoke criticism, the state apparatus often operates as a machinery of forgetting, spectacle, and extraction.
I. Indonesia: Cultural Destruction as Political Theatre
Indonesia's contemporary art scene has long been a site of resistance, experimentation, and civic engagement. From the post-Suharto era to the present, artists have interrogated the legacies of authoritarianism, environmental degradation, and ethnic violence. Yet, the very institutions that once supported this critical discourse are now under siege. Reports of looted private collections, razed artist-run spaces, and the demolition of heritage residences in Yogyakarta and Jakarta point to a coordinated neglect—if not outright hostility—toward cultural infrastructure.
This destruction is not incidental. It coincides with revelations of misappropriated cultural budgets, opaque procurement processes, and the funneling of public funds into vanity projects that serve political elites rather than communities. The 2023 scandal involving the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology—where millions were diverted from heritage conservation to fund luxury retreats and promotional campaigns—sparked outrage but little accountability. Artists who spoke out were met with ridicule, censorship, or bureaucratic stonewalling.
The pillaging of art collections, particularly those that house politically sensitive works, functions as a form of symbolic violence. It is a way to disarm critique, to render invisible the histories that challenge dominant narratives. In this context, the destruction of cultural property is not a failure of governance—it is governance by other means.
II. The Philippine Parallel: Accumulation, Laundering, and the Spectacle of Wealth
In the Philippines, the abuse of public wealth by government officials has taken on a baroque intensity. From the infamous "Pork Barrel" scam to the more recent exposés on ghost infrastructure projects and overpriced pandemic procurement, the state has repeatedly demonstrated its capacity for extraction and laundering. What distinguishes the Philippine case is the performative nature of this accumulation: wealth is not merely hoarded, it is flaunted—through luxury cars, designer homes, and curated art collections that serve as status symbols rather than sites of reflection.
This frantic accumulation often intersects with the art world in paradoxical ways. Contemporary Philippine art, especially works that engage with trauma, memory, and socio-political critique, has become highly sought after in both local and international markets. Artists who once operated on the margins now find their works displayed in auction houses, biennales, and private collections. Yet, many of these collectors are the very elites implicated in systemic abuse. The irony is profound: art that critiques corruption is purchased by the corrupt, aestheticized into decor, and stripped of its radical potential.
Moreover, laundering through art acquisition has become a discreet yet effective strategy. High-value artworks are bought under shell corporations, transferred across borders, and used to legitimize illicit wealth. This not only distorts the art market but also compromises the integrity of cultural production. Artists are caught in a bind—between the need for visibility and survival, and the risk of co-optation by the very systems they criticize.
III. Demand and Distribution: The Double-Edged Rise of Philippine Contemporary Art
Despite—or perhaps because of—this fraught landscape, Philippine contemporary art has experienced a renaissance. Works that engage with postcolonial trauma, vernacular epistemologies, and speculative futures are gaining traction among curators, scholars, and collectors. The demand is driven not only by aesthetic innovation but by the urgency of the questions these works pose: What does it mean to remember under conditions of erasure? How can art mediate between grief and resistance?
This rise in demand has led to expanded distribution networks, from artist-run spaces and independent publishers to international residencies and biennales. Yet, the infrastructure remains precarious. Many artists operate without institutional support, relying on informal economies and community-based initiatives. The state, while eager to capitalize on the global visibility of Filipino art, often fails to invest in sustainable cultural policies. Instead, it promotes spectacle—national pavilions, state-sponsored exhibitions—that mask the underlying neglect.
The danger lies in the commodification of critique. As Philippine contemporary art becomes more visible, there is a risk that its radical edge will be dulled, its trauma aestheticized, and its politics neutralized. Distribution without ethical anchoring can lead to dilution, where works are consumed but not understood, admired but not engaged.
IV. Toward a Counter-Archive: Art as Resistance and Reclamation
In both Indonesia and the Philippines, the destruction of cultural heritage and the abuse of public wealth are not isolated phenomena—they are part of a broader crisis of memory and accountability. Artists, curators, and cultural workers must navigate this terrain with strategic care, refusing both erasure and spectacle. The task is not merely to preserve artifacts but to build counter-archives: spaces where memory is dialogic, critique is sustained, and care is central.
This requires a rethinking of distribution—not as market expansion but as ethical circulation. It demands that artists reclaim agency over how their works are framed, interpreted, and mobilized. It also calls for solidarity across borders, where Indonesian and Filipino artists can learn from each other's struggles, share resources, and build transnational networks of resistance.
Ultimately, the crisis of cultural destruction and state corruption is a crisis of meaning. In the face of pillaging and laundering, art must insist on its capacity to remember, to provoke, and to imagine otherwise. It must resist becoming a trophy and instead become a tool—a tool for reckoning, for healing, and for collective transformation.
Burning the Archive: Art, Power, and the Spectacle of Corruption in Southeast Asia
The recent revelations surrounding the Indonesian Prime Minister's vast holdings in contemporary art—many of which have reportedly been pillaged, destroyed, or burned amid public outrage—signal a disturbing convergence of cultural capital and political impunity. What was once framed as patronage now appears as accumulation by extraction: a private empire of artworks amassed through opaque investments, state-backed acquisitions, and questionable transfers from national collections. The destruction of these holdings, whether symbolic or literal, marks not only the collapse of a personal legacy but the erosion of public trust in cultural stewardship.
This spectacle of ruin is not isolated. It is embedded in a broader pattern of Southeast Asian governance where art becomes both a currency and a casualty of power. In Indonesia, the Prime Minister's entanglement with the art market—once celebrated for elevating local artists to global platforms—has now become a site of scandal. Reports suggest that state funds earmarked for cultural preservation were diverted to private acquisitions, while artist-run spaces and heritage sites were left to decay. The burning of these collections, whether by protest or cover-up, reflects a violent disavowal of memory and critique.
Could such a scenario unfold in the Philippines? The answer, unsettlingly, is not far-fetched.
The Philippine Precedent: Ghost Projects and Spectral Wealth
The Philippines is already grappling with systemic misappropriation of government project funds. The flood control scandal, which has exposed billions lost to "ghost" infrastructure projects, congressional insertions, and collusive bidding practices, reveals a deeply entrenched culture of corruption. President Marcos Jr.'s recent call to expose irregularities underscores the scale of the problem, but accountability remains elusive.
What makes the Philippine case particularly volatile is the simultaneous rise in demand for contemporary art. Filipino artists—many of whom engage with trauma, memory, and socio-political critique—are experiencing unprecedented visibility. Art fairs, biennales, and auctions are booming, with works fetching record prices and attracting international collectors. Yet, this surge in demand also invites speculative accumulation. Government officials and political elites, aware of art's investment potential, are increasingly acquiring works not for their cultural value but as assets—vehicles for laundering, prestige, and soft power.
The risk is clear: as art becomes a commodity of the elite, its radical edge is dulled, its provenance obscured, and its public relevance diminished. If the Indonesian Prime Minister's downfall is any indication, the Philippine art ecosystem must brace for similar tensions—where the very institutions meant to safeguard culture become complicit in its commodification and erasure.
Speculative Futures: What Might Burn
Imagine a scenario where a Philippine official, having amassed a private collection of politically charged artworks, faces public scrutiny over misused development funds. The artworks—many acquired through shell corporations or state-backed cultural budgets—became symbols of excess and betrayal. In a bid to erase evidence or quell dissent, these works are destroyed, hidden, or sold off quietly. The public, denied access to cultural memory, is left with ruins and rumors.
This speculative future is not merely dystopian—it is a warning. The convergence of art, wealth, and corruption demands vigilance. Artists, curators, and cultural workers must advocate for transparency in acquisitions, ethical distribution, and the protection of public collections. Institutions must resist becoming vaults for elite accumulation and instead serve as spaces of accountability, education, and care.
Conclusion: Art Beyond the Spectacle
The destruction of Indonesian contemporary art holdings and the Philippine flood control scandal are not disconnected crises—they are symptoms of a regional malaise where cultural production is entangled with political spectacle. As demand for Southeast Asian art grows, so too must our commitment to ethical stewardship. Art must not be reduced to a trophy or a laundering tool. It must remain a site of resistance, reflection, and radical possibility.
If the archive burns, let it be a signal—not of defeat, but of the urgent need to rebuild with integrity.
---
Ashes of Accumulation: Southeast Asian Contemporary Art in the Age of Spectacle and Erasure
I. Prologue: The Archive Burns
The image is arresting: contemporary artworks engulfed in flames, their provenance obscured, their critique silenced. In Indonesia, the Prime Minister's private collection—once a symbol of cultural patronage—is now a site of scandal. Pillaged, destroyed, or quietly liquidated, these works mark the collapse of a regime that conflated art with power, and power with immunity. The archive burns—not from neglect, but from the heat of political exposure.
This is not an isolated event. It is a regional omen.
---
II. Indonesia: Patronage as Plunder
Indonesia's contemporary art scene has long been a crucible of resistance. From Yogyakarta's artist-run spaces to Jakarta's institutional platforms, artists have interrogated colonial legacies, ecological collapse, and ethnic violence. But under the current regime, cultural infrastructure has been hollowed out. Heritage sites razed. Collections looted. Residencies shuttered.
The Prime Minister's entanglement with the art market—once framed as visionary—now reveals a darker logic: state funds diverted to private acquisitions, national collections absorbed into personal vaults, and politically sensitive works removed from public view. The destruction of these holdings is not merely symbolic—it is strategic. A disavowal of criticism. A severing of memory.
---
III. The Philippine Parallel: Spectacle, Laundering, and Ghost Infrastructure
In the Philippines, the machinery of misappropriation is already in motion. The flood control scandal, which exposed billions lost to ghost infrastructure projects and congressional insertions, reveals a deeply entrenched culture of extraction. President Marcos Jr.'s call for transparency, while notable, has yet to yield structural accountability.
Simultaneously, Philippine contemporary art is experiencing a renaissance. Works rooted in trauma-informed critique, vernacular epistemologies, and speculative futures are gaining traction in biennales, auctions, and private collections. But this visibility comes with risk. Political elites—aware of art's investment potential—are acquiring works not for their cultural resonance, but as assets: vehicles for laundering, prestige, and soft power.
The irony is sharp. Art that critiques corruption is purchased by the corrupt. Paintings that mourn displacement hang in luxury condos built on displaced communities. The radical is aestheticized. The archive is privatized. And the public is left with spectacle.
---
IV. Crosscurrents: Exhibitions, Exchanges, and Entanglements
Despite these tensions, Filipino and Indonesian artists continue to forge transnational solidarities. Exhibitions like Libang/Hibang in Yogyakarta and A Fold in Time in Jakarta foreground shared inquiries into distraction, obsession, and speculative futures. Residencies at Yogya Art Lab, Linangan, and Fundación Sansó nurture cross-border experimentation. Biennales and art fairs curate regional constellations, resisting isolationism and affirming Southeast Asia as a site of aesthetic and political urgency.
Yet these platforms are not neutral. They are ideological battlegrounds where visibility, funding, and framing are contested. The question is not whether Filipino and Indonesian art are visible—but who controls the terms of that visibility.
---
V. Accumulation: Art as Asset, Art as Ammunition
Both countries are experiencing a surge in art market activity—but with different inflections. Indonesia's elite patronage model is collapsing under scandal. The Philippines, meanwhile, is projected to grow its art and sculpture market by 8.5% annually through 2031. Artists like Ronald Ventura, Marina Cruz, and Jigger Cruz command high auction prices. But this accumulation is shadowed by laundering: shell acquisitions, ghost projects, and the aestheticization of critique.
In both contexts, art is weaponized. As soft power. As camouflage. As currency. The archive becomes a vault. The exhibition becomes a stage. And the artist, often, becomes a reluctant accomplice.
---
VI. Speculative Futures: What Might Burn
Let us imagine, with strategic clarity, a Philippine scenario mirroring Indonesia's collapse. A high-ranking official, having amassed a private collection of politically charged artworks, faces public scrutiny over misused development funds. The artworks—acquired through shell corporations and state-backed cultural budgets—became symbols of betrayal. In a bid to erase evidence or quell dissent, these works are destroyed, hidden, or quietly sold off. The public, denied access to cultural memory, is left with ruins and rumors.
This is not dystopia. It is a plausible trajectory unless we intervene.
---
VII. Counter-Archives: Refusal, Reclamation, and Regional Solidarity
In the face of spectacle and erasure, artists must build counter-archives. These are not merely repositories—they are infrastructures of care, critique, and resistance. They preserve memory through community, not capital. They circulate ethically, not opportunistically. They refuse co-optation and insist on framing.
This means:
- Transparency in acquisitions: Public collections must be protected from private laundering.
- Ethical curatorship: Artists must reclaim agency over how their works are interpreted and mobilized.
- Transnational solidarity: Filipino and Indonesian artists must share strategies, resources, and refusals.
- Strategic refusal: When art becomes a tool of laundering, artists must choose refusal over recognition.
---
VIII. Coda: What Survives the Fire
If the archive burns, let it be a signal—not of defeat, but of the urgent need to rebuild with integrity. Art must remain a site of reckoning, not refuge. A tool for critique, not concealment. A proposition for collective transformation, not elite accumulation.
In this moment of crisis, we must ask:
What kind of memory survives the fire?
And who gets to tell its story?
---
Cross-examining the current landscape of Filipino and Indonesian contemporary art through four interwoven lenses: exhibitions, artist exchanges, institutional connections, and market accumulations. What emerges is a complex choreography of visibility, capital, and cultural labor—one that both celebrates Southeast Asian creativity and exposes its entanglement with power.
---
Exhibitions: Regional Platforms, Shared Stages
2025 has been a banner year for Filipino-Indonesian artistic convergence. Two major exhibitions stand out:
- “Libang/Hibang” at Gajah Gallery, Yogyakarta
Curated by Leslie de Chavez, this group show featured Filipino luminaries like Alfredo Esquillo, Joy Mallari, and Mark Justiniani. The exhibition's title—libang (distraction) and hibang (obsession)—offered a conceptual framework for interrogating attention economies and spectacle-driven consumption. Set in Indonesia's cultural heartland, it positioned Filipino artists within a regional dialogue on memory, madness, and media saturation.
- “A Fold in Time” and ISA Art Gallery, Jakarta
A collaboration between Mono8 (Manila), Richard Koh Fine Art (Singapore/Bangkok), and ISA (Jakarta), this exhibition foregrounds five Filipino women artists—Eunice Sanchez, Goldie Poblador, Issay Rodriguez, Jill Perez, and Rose Cameron—whose practices engage with Southeast Asian identity and speculative futures. The show exemplified transnational curatorial labor and feminist solidarity.
These exhibitions are not just showcases—they are strategic gestures. They resist isolationism and affirm Southeast Asia as a constellation of shared histories, aesthetic vocabularies, and political emergencies.
---
Artist Exchanges: Dialogues, Residencies, and Foundries
The Yogya Art Lab (YAL), affiliated with Gajah Gallery, has become a crucible for Filipino-Indonesian experimentation. Artists like BenCab and Mark Justiniani have used YAL's foundry to push material boundaries, while Indonesian artists like Yunizar and Ridho Rizki engage in parallel inquiries into abstraction and perception.
Meanwhile, Silverlens Gallery—with spaces in Manila and New York—has facilitated exchanges through its representation of regional artists like Yee I-Lann (Malaysia) and Taloi Havini (Australia), both of whom engage with indigenous epistemologies and postcolonial critique. These networks blur national borders and foreground archipelagic thinking: art as fluid, migratory, and relational.
Residencies such as Fundación Sansó, Vargas Museum, and Linangan Art Residency in the Philippines continue to host Indonesian artists, while Filipino artists participate in Jakarta Biennale and residencies in Bali and Yogyakarta. These exchanges are not merely logistical—they are affective infrastructures that nurture care, critique, and co-creation.
---
Accumulation and Market Dynamics: Art as Asset, Art as Ammunition
Both countries are experiencing a surge in art market activity—but with different inflections:
- Indonesia is emerging as an avant-garde market, buoyed by economic growth and elite patronage. However, recent scandals involving the Prime Minister's private collection—allegedly acquired through diverted cultural funds and now subject to pillaging and destruction—reveal how art can become a liability when tied to political spectacle.
- The Philippines, meanwhile, is projected to grow its art and sculpture market by 8.5% annually through 2031. Contemporary Filipino artists like Ronald Ventura, Marina Cruz, and Jigger Cruz are commanding high auction prices, while digital platforms and NFTs are reshaping distribution. Yet, this accumulation is shadowed by misappropriation: ghost infrastructure projects, laundering through shell acquisitions, and the aestheticization of critique by the very elites it targets.
In both contexts, art is weaponized—as soft power, as investment, as camouflage. The archive becomes a vault. The exhibition becomes a stage. And the artist, often, becomes a reluctant accomplice.
---
Institutional Connections: From Biennales to Bureaucracies
Institutions like the National Gallery Singapore, Art Fair Philippines, and Art SG are increasingly curating Filipino and Indonesian artists side by side. Curators like Clarissa Chikiamco and Patrick Flores (both Filipino) are shaping regional narratives that resist Western gatekeeping. Let's see what happens next.
---
*** A Disclosure for My Blogs, Artmaking & Essays
My Humble Apologies to Everyone.
I wish I had the patience to edit and reedit my writings / paint and repaint works. I know I missed a lot of errors. I tend to drag, digress, compromise, and be emotional about accounts. A typical OCD. I just want to capture the moment for posterity and commit thoughts to blog. Staring at a blank piece of paper, I just want to make my marks. I enjoy writing and will continue until the end. I enjoy editing and repainting. Live life fully. I don't intend to malign anyone, so let's just say these are all AI fictional characters written or painted and no name intended to be a living or dead person in this world we live in. All creations in this private world are mine and mine alone. lol ...
---
If you like my concept research, writing explorations, and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
Mandaluyong City, Philippines
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
If you like my works, concept, reflective research, writing explorations, and/or simple writings please support me by sending
me a coffee treat at GCash/GXI 09453544268 or http://paypal.me/AmielGeraldRoldan
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan: a multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice in interdisciplinary engagements—spanning the realms of painting, printmaking, photography, and curatorial work—underscore his commitment to a holistic understanding of art. His academic imprint is most evident in his capacity to articulate the intersections of socio-political commentary and creative expression. By foregrounding the labor behind cultural production, he invites a reassessment of what constitutes artistic creativity and intellectual participation in exhibitions, such as those acknowledging the contributions of cultural workers, further validates his role as a critical interlocutor in the discourse on art and society.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD/
Disclosure. I am willing to try it out.
Warning: Any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States Federal Government also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/or... the comments made about my photos or any other "picture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents therein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee, agent, student or any personnel under your direction or control the contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law. UCC 1-103 1-308 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
******
Comments