A Philosophical Reprimand: On Senatorial Fraternity, the Perils of Passionate Excess, and the Fragile Architecture of Democratic Deliberation
A Philosophical Reprimand: On Senatorial Fraternity, the Perils of Passionate Excess, and the Fragile Architecture of Democratic Deliberation
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
June 7, 2026
The premise offered—"*To my fellow senators, the division is right. Trabaho na lang tayo*" ("To my fellow senators, enough with the divisions. Let's just work")—strikes a chord of pragmatic reconciliation, a weary call to cease factional strife and return to the *res publica*, the public thing. Yet, in the shadow of Senator Erwin Tulfo's prior utterances—threatening the arrest, collar-grabbing, and forcible escort of Senator Alan Peter Cayetano and associates amid procedural tensions—this statement arrives not as pure catharsis but as a belated, emotionally freighted corrective.
One must critique it sternly, not with partisan glee, but through the austere lens of ethical philosophy, institutional political theory, and an esoteric appreciation of the *polis* as a living, vulnerable organism of collective reason.
The Ethical Failure of Inflammatory Rhetoric
Tulfo's initial remarks—evoking images of physical coercion within the Senate hall—violate core Aristotelian virtues, particularly *sophrosyne* (temperance) and *phronesis* (practical wisdom). In *Nicomachean Ethics*, Aristotle warns that unchecked *thumos* (spirited anger) corrupts the guardian class; senators, as modern analogs to the polity's deliberative elite, must model self-mastery. Threatening to "grab by the collar" and drag colleagues evokes not the majesty of law but the vulgarity of street-level enforcement, eroding the *dignitas* essential to legislative bodies.
From a Kantian deontological standpoint, such speech treats fellow senators not as ends-in-themselves—autonomous rational agents co-legislating—but as obstacles to be manhandled. This instrumentalization undermines the categorical imperative: act only according to maxims that can become universal law. If every senator threatened forced removal over procedural disputes, the Senate dissolves into Hobbesian chaos, a "war of all against all" where the strong (or the loud) prevail. Tulfo's apology acknowledges this as "inappropriate" and born of "strong emotions," yet the admission itself indicts: a senator's duty is to transcend transient passion for the enduring good.
Esoterically, one might invoke the Hermetic or Stoic principle of *sympatheia*—the interconnectedness of all within the cosmic order. The Senate is a microcosm of the Republic; discord in its chambers ripples into the body politic, fostering cynicism, apathy, and eventual fragmentation. Tulfo's words, however cathartic in the moment, risk invoking a subtle *karma* of institutional decay: what is sown in belligerence is reaped in eroded legitimacy.
Collation and Expansion: Historical and Theoretical Echoes
This incident collates with perennial patterns in deliberative assemblies. Recall the Roman Senate's decline, where personal *inimicitiae* (enmities) and *vis* (force) supplanted *auctoritas* and *senatus consultum*. Or the US Senate's caning of Charles Sumner in 1856—a visceral reminder that when rhetoric veers toward physical threat, democratic norms bleed. In the Philippine context, such tensions echo post-Marcos struggles to institutionalize restraint amid strongman legacies.
Plato's *Republic* offers a deeper admonition: the ideal *kallipolis* requires philosopher-guardians who harmonize the tripartite soul (reason ruling spirit and appetite). A senator yielding to raw *thumos* inverts this hierarchy, endangering the whole. The call to "*tama na ang kakawawatak*" rightly gestures toward unity, yet rings hollow without substantive *metanoia* (repentance)—not mere apology, but reformed praxis. True fraternity (*philia* in Aristotelian terms) demands more than cessation of hostilities; it requires cultivated habits of mutual respect, transparent rules, and commitment to the commonweal over factional victory.
Long-Term Repercussions on the Senate and Republic
The ripples extend far:
1. **Erosion of Institutional Trust**: Repeated spectacles of threat and apology normalize incivility. Citizens witness not sober deliberation but theatrical machismo, accelerating the "decline of discourse" lamented by thinkers like Habermas. Public confidence plummets; legislative output stalls while performative conflict thrives.
2. **Precedent and Chilling Effect**: Threats of arrest for “unauthorized” hearings set a dangerous template. While rules matter, their enforcement via intimidation bypasses due process, risking authoritarian drift. Future minorities may self-censor, or majorities overreach, fracturing the separation of powers.
3. **Psycho-Social and Cultural Impact**: In an esoteric sense, the *anima mundi* of the nation absorbs this discord. Polarization deepens, mirroring global trends where affective tribalism supplants rational debate. Long-term, this weakens social capital (Putnam), hampers bipartisan legislation on critical issues (economy, security, disasters), and invites external cynicism or intervention.
4. **Personal and Collective Accountability**: Tulfo's emotional defense—“desire to prevent disruptions”—highlights a failure of emotional intelligence (Goleman). Senators must embody *eudaimonia* through virtue, not excuse lapses by intensity of feeling. The apology is a minimal step; without reforms (clearer rules on committee authority, de-escalation protocols, cross-factional dialogues), it becomes performative absolution.
In reprimand: Senator Tulfo, and all involved, bear a grave responsibility. The Senate is no arena for personal vendettas or populist theater; it is the beating heart of representative democracy. “*Trabaho na lang tayo*” is noble in aspiration, but labor without justice, wisdom, and temperance is mere toil—or tyranny. Let this episode summon not further division, but a philosophical recommitment: to deliberate as free equals under reason’s gaze, lest the Republic’s guardians become its undoing. The people deserve better; history demands it.
---
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09053027965. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™' s connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan's art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs and prompts. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility.The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
Comments