When the State Devours Its Young: The Family's Abdication and the Leviathan's Opportunistic Grasp
When the State Devours Its Young: The Family's Abdication and the Leviathan's Opportunistic Grasp
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
June 25, 2026
In the grand theater of human governance, few questions cut as sharply as this: At what precise moment does the state, that hulking Hobbesian Leviathan, wrest meaningful advantage from the family over minors who commit heinous acts? When does the sacred hearth—once the primordial unit of rearing, discipline, and moral formation—yield to the cold apparatus of bureaucracy, courts, and correctional "facilities"? The recent tragedies in the Philippines, the Tacloban school shooting and the Ateneo drowning incident (framed here as alleged homicide via negligence), illuminate this tension with brutal clarity. They are not mere aberrations but symptoms of familial negligence colliding with institutional failure, inviting the state to expand its dominion under the guise of protection and justice. One might snarkily observe that modernity's gift to parents is the perpetual outsourcing of responsibility: raise them poorly, arm them with grudges and guns, then feign shock when the state steps in to play both nanny and warden.
Philosophically, this dynamic echoes the social contract theorists with a venomous twist. Thomas Hobbes, in *Leviathan*, envisioned the state as an artificial sovereign born from humanity's nasty, brutish baseline to escape the war of all against all. Families, in this schema, are pre-political but fragile; when they fail to curb the "perpetual and restless desire of power after power," the state must intervene. John Locke, more optimistically, rooted parental authority in natural law and stewardship, but even he conceded the state's role in protecting life, liberty, and property when guardians falter. Jean-Jacques Rousseau romanticized the noble savage and the general will, yet his *Émile* betrays a distrust of unguided familial upbringing, advocating state-guided education to mold citizens. Fast-forward to Michel Foucault: the state's "advantage" is biopower incarnate—disciplinary mechanisms that infiltrate the family, school, and psyche, turning deviant minors into objects of surveillance, rehabilitation, and control. The family doesn't lose rights so much as it reveals its bankruptcy, handing the state a blank check to govern the ungovernable.
Consider the Tacloban Massacre at San Jose National High School on June 22, 2026. Two minors, aged 14 and 15, armed with a Glock pistol (linked to a police officer) and a .38 revolver (from a security agency), opened fire in apparent revenge for bullying. Three students dead, twenty injured. Premeditated, per police, with social media hints of violent tendencies. Families cry for justice—rightly—while demanding gun owners be charged. Yet the snarky philosophical observer cannot resist: Where was *patria potestas*—that ancient Roman paternal power—when these boys accessed firearms? Where was the family's role as "primary nurturing" unit, as enshrined in the Philippines' Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act (RA 9344)? This law, a progressive nod to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, prioritizes diversion, rehabilitation, and family maintenance for children in conflict with the law (CICL). Minors under 15 are exempt from criminal liability; 15-18 face mitigated responsibility. Noble in intent, perhaps, but it presupposes functional families. When parents (or state proxies like schools) neglect supervision, the state gains *de facto* custody through intervention programs, DSWD facilities, or calls to lower the age of responsibility (now amplified post-Tacloban).
The Ateneo case compounds the negligence thesis. Two university basketball players, Rene Baterbonia and Divine Adili, drowned during a team-building activity in Aurora in June 2026. CIDG probes point to possible hazing, homicide, or gross negligence by coaches and organizers—not mere accident. Waves swept them away amid alleged safety lapses. Here, the "minors" (or young adults in a university setting) and their perpetrators blur: institutional "families" (the athletic program, alma mater) failed in loco parentis. The state, via CIDG reconstruction and potential charges, asserts oversight. Snark aside, this reveals how negligence cascades: biological families entrust children to schools and teams; those entities drop the ball; the sovereign steps in with investigations, liability, and regulatory expansion. Families of victims demand accountability, while families of perpetrators (or negligent adults) retreat into denial or victimhood. The state wins either way—more power, more purview.
Philosophically deeper, this is the erosion of subsidiarity—the principle (Catholic social teaching resonates in the Philippines) that higher authorities should not usurp what lower ones can handle. Families are the lowest, most intimate level. When they abdicate—through absent parenting, failure to instill impulse control, or enabling access to weapons—the state does not "gain advantage" benevolently; it exploits the vacuum. John Stuart Mill's harm principle warns against overreach into personal liberty, yet he allows intervention to prevent harm to others. Heinous crimes by minors harm society profoundly, justifying state action, but the snarky retort is: Prevention begins at home. Reactive statism rewards parental failure. Empirical patterns in Philippine juvenile justice show many CICL stem from "crimes of poverty," broken homes, and peer influence—precisely where family primacy collapses.
Critics of RA 9344, especially post-Tacloban, clamor to lower the age of criminal responsibility to 12 or 9, echoing Duterte-era punitivism. Proponents argue deterrence; opponents cite neuroscience (brains develop into the mid-20s) and rehabilitation's superiority. Both miss the philosophical core: the state's advantage peaks when families prove incapable of the "primary nurturing and rearing" mandated by law. This creates a feedback loop. Negligent families produce troubled youth; tragedies ensue; public outrage empowers the state to encroach further—mandatory programs, lowered thresholds, expanded facilities. The perpetrators' families face scrutiny, potential liability for damages or gun negligence. Victims' families receive state-mediated "justice," often hollow. In both Tacloban and Ateneo, negligence (familial, institutional) is the common rot. The state, ever opportunistic, positions itself as savior while consolidating power.
One might expound with Arendtian flair: the banality of evil here is not just bureaucratic but domestic. Ordinary parental lapses—unchecked bullying trauma, unsecured firearms, lax oversight of "team-building"—enable atrocity. The state, in response, risks totalizing its role, treating families as probationary units subject to revocation. Rousseau's *Social Contract* warned of the general will subsuming particulars; Foucault would smirk at the panopticon extending from school CCTV to family court monitors. A snarky synthesis: Modernity liberated individuals from "oppressive" traditional families, only for the state to become the ultimate deadbeat dad—distant, punitive, and inefficient at genuine rehabilitation.
Ultimately, the threshold is crossed not at a fixed age but at demonstrated familial incompetence. The Tacloban shooters and Ateneo negligence expose this: when families fail to prevent heinous acts or their enablers, the state inherits the minors, the narrative, and the authority. True reform demands not just tweaking juvenile laws but cultural insistence on parental accountability—perhaps with teeth, like presumptive liability for guardians. Otherwise, the Leviathan grows fatter on the failures of the hearth, philosophically justified yet humanly tragic. In the Philippines' archipelago of dysfunction, these tragedies are not anomalies; they are the predictable harvest of neglected soil. The state advances, families recede, and society pays in blood and bureaucracy.
The essay's bite lies in its honesty: protection of minors requires strong families first. Absent that, the state's "advantage" is inevitable—and corrosive.
The Fractured Canvas: Philippine Art, the State's Predatory Ascendancy, and the Familial Abyss in the Shadow of Tacloban and Ateneo
In the chiaroscuro of Philippine existence, where the archipelago's layered histories of colonial subjugation, martial authoritarianism, and neoliberal fragmentation converge, art has long served as both mirror and scalpel. The premise—that the state gains decisive advantage over the family precisely when the latter's negligence or collapse enables heinous crimes by minors—finds its most potent nexus in the critical tradition of Philippine social realism and its esoteric, myth-infused evolutions. The recent Tacloban school shooting (June 22, 2026, San Jose National High School: two minors, 14 and 15, armed with pilfered firearms, killing three students and wounding dozens in a premeditated act of revenge) and the Ateneo de Manila basketball players' drowning in Aurora (June 8, 2026: Rene Clert Baterbonia and Divine Adili, swept by currents amid alleged hazing or gross institutional negligence during a team-building exercise) are not isolated pathologies. They are symptomatic ruptures wherein familial abdication invites the Leviathan's biopower, a dynamic rendered visible, visceral, and philosophically incisive through the lens of Filipino artistic praxis.
Social realism, forged in the crucible of the 1970s by collectives like Kaisahan ("Solidarity"), embodies this dialectic with unsparing fidelity. Artists such as Antipas Delotavo, Renato Habulan, and Edgar Fernandez wielded paint as polemical weapon against the intertwined tyrannies of imperialism, feudalism, and bureaucratic capitalism. Delotavo's *Dama II* (1994), with its grid of menacing firearms and ambiguous human fragments, prophetically evokes the Tacloban minors' access to a Glock and .38 revolver—traces of state-adjacent provenance (police and security links) infiltrating the domestic sphere. Here, the family is no autonomous sanctuary but a porous vessel, its failures (unchecked access to violence, unaddressed bullying trauma, absent moral scaffolding) ceding ground to state mechanisms: RA 9344's juvenile justice framework, DSWD interventions, and post-tragedy calls to lower the age of criminal responsibility. The state's "advantage" crystallizes as Foucauldian discipline—rehabilitation programs, surveillance, expanded carceral welfarism—usurping *patria potestas* when the hearth proves bankrupt.
Esoterically, this mirrors the alchemical transmutation in Rodel Tapaya's mythic-surreal canvases. Tapaya's folkloric cosmogonies—roosters as harbingers of cockfighting machismo and state violence, aswang-like predators devouring the vulnerable—reframe contemporary atrocities as eternal recurrences of postcolonial trauma. In works evoking extrajudicial killings or societal fear, the family unit dissolves into a chaotic archipelago of metamorphoses: parents as spectral absentees, youth as both victims and vessels for inherited monstrosity. The Tacloban perpetrators, products of "crimes of poverty" and broken homes per juvenile justice patterns, embody Tapaya's hooded witnesses or garlic-defying nocturnal horrors—state-enabled yet familially incubated. Likewise, the Ateneo incident, where an elite institution's *in loco parentis* negligence (safety lapses, possible hazing) leads to young lives extinguished by indifferent waves, echoes the state's opportunistic reconstruction: CIDG probes, Senate inquiries, regulatory tightening. The biological family recedes; the institutional "family" fails; the sovereign apparatus—ever the aswang in bureaucratic guise—feeds and expands.
Philosophically, one discerns a Hegelian master-slave inversion laced with Arendtian banality and Confucian-vernacular subsidiarity's betrayal. The 1987 Philippine Constitution sacralizes the family as "basic autonomous social institution" with "primary right and duty" in rearing the young, yet praxis reveals its fragility. When negligence precipitates heinousness—firearms in adolescent hands, unsupervised aquatic rituals—the state, per social contract logic twisted by Foucault, assumes guardianship not as liberator but as totalizing collector of souls. Kaisahan's manifesto, demanding art for the masses that enacts social change, critiques this precisely: art must expose how poverty, absent parenting, and systemic rot produce "children in conflict with the law" (CICL), only for the state to punish the symptoms while ignoring its complicity in structural violence.
Critically, this nexus indicts the romanticization of familial primacy. Philippine art's social realist strain—raw, didactic, unflinching—rejects bourgeois sentimentality. Habulan's depictions of laborers and fractured domesticities parallel the Tacloban families' cries for justice alongside the perpetrators' domestic voids. The Ateneo tragedy, implicating elite educational "families," unveils class-inflected negligence: the same state that underfunds public schools (Tacloban) and security apparatuses now investigates private institutions, consolidating narrative control. Esoterically, this evokes pre-colonial animist ontologies where spirits (anito) inhabit liminal spaces—here, the threshold between family failure and state overreach. Negligence is the possessing demon; the state, the exorcist who demands fealty in exchange for order.
Contemporary extensions—participatory protest art, archival reenactments of massacres, community pantries as social practice—further expound this. Artists responding to drug war violence or Escalante commemorations render the minor-as-perpetrator/victim as a site of contested sovereignty. The family's erosion hands the state its "advantage": lowered liability thresholds, expanded facilities, biopower over malleable youth. Yet art's critical function, per Guillermo and Flores, lies in refusing this inevitability—insisting on subsidiarity's revival through cultural insistence on parental accountability, lest the canvas of society remain stained by bureaucratic overgrowth.
In sum, Philippine art does not merely illustrate the premise; it ontologically dissects it. Tacloban and Ateneo are tableaux vivants of familial abdication and statist predation, rendered in the blood-red palettes of Delotavo, the mythic densities of Tapaya, and the collective solidarities of Kaisahan. The esoteric truth: the state's gain is no neutral evolution but a symptomatic pathology of a polity where the hearth's flame gutters, inviting the cold fluorescence of institutional dominion. True critique—and redemption—demands art that not only exposes but agitates for families resilient enough to starve the Leviathan of its opportunistic feasts. Absent that, the archipelago's youth will continue to bleed across canvases both literal and painted, perpetual subjects of a state that devours what the family forsakes.
---
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09053027965. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™' s connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan's art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs and prompts. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility.The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
Comments