The Ontological Crisis of Legitimacy – Power, Quorum, and the Void in the Senate
Fractured Gavel, Spectral Canvas: The Esoteric Schism of Senate Legitimacy as Living Philippine Art
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
June 4, 2026
Tensions in the Senate continue to escalate after Senator Sherwin Gatchalian asserted that he is the current Acting Senate President following a controversial reorganization of the Upper House.
In a press conference on June 4, Gatchalian stated directly:
“I am the Acting Senate President.”
This declaration follows the events of June 3, when 12 senators conducted a session and declared a quorum, leading to the declaration of several key positions and committee chairmanships as vacant.
After the reorganization, Gatchalian was elected as Senate President Pro Tempore and served as the presiding officer of the chamber.
However, Senate President Alan Peter Cayetano, Senator Pia Cayetano, and their allies have strongly questioned the legality of this move. According to them, the Senate has 24 members, requiring 13 senators to constitute a majority for a quorum.
Alan Peter Cayetano had previously stated that he remains the legitimate and legal Senate President.
“I am still the legitimate, legal, moral Senate President of the Republic of the Philippines.”
Meanwhile, the two camps remain diametrically opposed regarding the validity of the reorganization. While Gatchalian’s camp insists that the actions taken on June 3 are valid, Cayetano’s camp maintains that they have no effect due to the alleged lack of a quorum.
As a result, the central question remains: who holds the legitimate authority to lead the Senate while awaiting the possible next moves from both sides?
The Ontological Crisis of Legitimacy – Power, Quorum, and the Void in the Senate
In the turbid theater of Philippine politics, where the baroque architecture of constitutional democracy collides with the raw agonism of human ambition, the recent confrontation between Senators Sherwin Gatchalian and Alan Peter Cayetano transcends mere procedural dispute. It becomes a profound philosophical parable: a meditation on the nature of *authority*, the fragility of *institutional being*, and the perennial chasm between *de jure* law and *de facto* power. What does it mean for a body politic—specifically the Senate of the Republic—to declare itself led by one man when another claims the same mantle through rival interpretations of the same sacred text (the Constitution and Senate Rules)?
This episode reveals the **esoteric truth** that all political legitimacy is, at root, a metaphysical fiction sustained by collective belief. As Carl Schmitt observed in his critique of parliamentary democracy, the sovereign is he who decides on the exception. Here, the exception is the quorum: that mystical number (13 out of 24) which transforms a mere gathering of elites into a legitimate *corpus politicum*. When twelve senators convened on June 3, declared a quorum, vacated positions, and elevated Gatchalian as President Pro Tempore, they performed a ritual act of *re-foundation*. They attempted to re-constitute the Senate’s being ex nihilo—or at least ex defectu.
Yet Cayetano’s counter-claim—that he remains the “legitimate, legal, moral” Senate President—invokes a deeper Platonic layer. He appeals not merely to procedural arithmetic but to a *moral ontology* of office. This is reminiscent of the medieval doctrine of the King’s Two Bodies: the mortal, physical holder of the seat versus the immortal, institutional dignity that persists beyond any single occupant. Cayetano positions himself as the enduring *dignitas* of the Senate, while portraying Gatchalian’s faction as engaging in a form of political necromancy—attempting to resurrect a new body from an allegedly still-living one.
The Philosophical Abyss: Quorum as Social Contract
At its core, this conflict is a microcosm of the Hobbesian state of nature transposed into the marble halls of the Senate. Thomas Hobbes warned that covenants without the sword are but words. Here, the “sword” is the recognition by other institutions (the Executive, the Supreme Court, the public, the international community). Without it, both claimants exist in a superposition of legitimacy and illegitimacy—Schrödinger’s Senate Presidents.
The requirement of a majority quorum is not a trivial bureaucratic detail; it is a **social contract in miniature**. Jean-Jacques Rousseau might see in the Gatchalian group’s action an exercise of the *volonté générale* of a faction claiming to represent the whole. John Locke, ever the empiricist and proceduralist, would likely side with Cayetano’s insistence on strict numerical fidelity. Yet both miss the Nietzschean insight: truth in politics is a mobile army of metaphors. “Quorum” is a metaphor for collective will. When that will fractures, the institution enters a liminal state—an *esoteric interregnum* where power reveals itself as pure potentiality, awaiting the stronger narrative.
This event also echoes the ancient Roman concept of *interregnum* and the *auctoritas* versus *potestas* distinction. Gatchalian possesses the *potestas* (raw institutional power seized through motion and declaration), while Cayetano clings to *auctoritas* (the moral and traditional prestige of prior election). In times of crisis, the two rarely coincide—a truth as old as the Roman Republic’s collapse into triumvirates and eventual empire.
Esoteric Dimensions: The Senate as Microcosm of the Republic
Philosophically, the Senate of the Philippines—modeled after the American system yet infused with the passionate, familial, and patronage-driven character of Philippine political culture—functions as a microcosm of the Republic itself. The struggle over who “is” the Acting Senate President is therefore a struggle over the soul of Philippine democracy. It reveals the deep tension between:
- **Legal positivism** (rules are rules; 12 is not 13)
- **Political realism** (power belongs to those bold enough to seize the moment)
- **Hermeneutic constructivism** (the Constitution is not a dead letter but a living text open to interpretation in extremis)
In an esoteric sense, this is a battle over *naming*. To name oneself “Senate President” is an Adamic act—an attempt to call reality into being through language. Gatchalian’s declaration “I am the Acting Senate President” is a performative utterance in the Austinian sense, whose success depends not on its internal truth but on its felicity conditions (audience uptake). When those conditions are contested, language itself fractures, and with it, institutional reality.
Deeper Implications
This crisis gestures toward a more unsettling truth: modern democratic institutions rest upon a thin veneer of shared fictions. When those fictions are challenged—whether by quorum disputes, electoral protests, or populist surges—the void beneath becomes visible. The Senate, meant to be the chamber of sober deliberation and statesmanship (*senex* = elder), reveals itself as yet another arena of raw *thumos* (spiritedness) and *pleonexia* (greed for more).
In the end, the resolution will likely come not from pure philosophy or pure law, but from the pragmatic convergence of power, public perception, and judicial arbitration. Yet the philosophical residue remains: every political order is haunted by its own potential dissolution. The Gatchalian-Cayetano schism is not merely about who presides over committee assignments or legislative calendars. It is about the eternal question: *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*—and more profoundly, *Who decides who the guardians are when the guardians themselves are divided?*
The Senate’s current liminality invites us to reflect on the impermanence of all human orders. As Heraclitus might remind us, one cannot step into the same Senate twice—especially when two men claim to embody its presiding spirit. The true “acting” president may be neither man, but the restless spirit of politics itself, forever reorganizing the fragments of authority in its eternal becoming.
The Fractured Pantheon: Legitimacy, Duality, and the Esoteric Void in Philippine Political Ontology through the Lens of National Art
The recent Senate crisis—wherein Senator Sherwin Gatchalian proclaimed himself Acting Senate President following a contested June 3 reorganization by twelve senators, while Alan Peter Cayetano asserts his enduring legitimacy as the “legal, moral” presiding officer—transcends procedural wrangling. It manifests a profound ontological rupture in the Philippine body politic: a schism in the *corpus mysticum* of democratic authority. This event finds its most resonant philosophical and critical articulation not in dry constitutional exegesis, but in the turbulent, hybrid, and often haunted tradition of Philippine art. From the chiaroscuro romanticism of Fernando Amorsolo to the lacerating social realism of the 1970s, and onward to contemporary installation and performance practices, Philippine visual culture has long served as an esoteric mirror to the nation’s recurring crises of foundation, naming, and fractured sovereignty.
The Senate as Palimpsest: Art’s Revelation of Institutional Spectrality
Philippine art, particularly in its post-colonial and martial-law-inflected phases, obsessively interrogates the theme of **legitimate succession and the void beneath power**. Consider Benedicto Cabrera’s (BenCab) seminal works, such as *The Brown Madonna* or his Sabel series. Sabel, that iconic bundled, windswept figure, embodies a spectral, displaced subjectivity—forever on the threshold of belonging. In the Gatchalian-Cayetano confrontation, we witness a political Sabel: two figures claiming to inhabit the same institutional “body,” each wrapped in the tattered cloak of procedural legitimacy. The quorum dispute (12 vs. the required 13) becomes a visual metaphor for incomplete form. Much like BenCab’s distorted, layered figures that refuse singular identity, the Senate now exists in a state of superposition—both led and unled, constituted and deconstituted.
This resonates with the deeper esoteric strain in Philippine art: the persistence of the *anito* (ancestral spirit) within supposedly modern, rational institutions. Just as colonial-era *santos* and *retablos* grafted indigenous animism onto Catholic iconography, the Senate—modeled on American bicameralism—remains possessed by pre-modern logics of *dang* (power/prestige), familial alliance, and messianic leadership. Cayetano’s invocation of moral continuity (“I am still the legitimate... Senate President”) echoes the *translatio imperii* motif in religious art, where divine right transfers unbroken across vessels. Gatchalian’s bold performative declaration (“I am the Acting Senate President”), by contrast, performs a more radical, almost Dadaist rupture—an act of *re-naming* akin to the iconoclastic gestures in protest art during the Marcos era.
Duality and the Two Bodies of the Senate
The crisis evokes Ernst Kantorowicz’s medieval theology of the King’s Two Bodies, here refracted through Philippine artistic explorations of duality. In José T. Joya’s abstract expressionist works—vibrant yet fractured surfaces of color and texture—one senses the tension between surface harmony and underlying chaos. The Senate, like Joya’s canvases, presents a façade of institutional coherence while revealing tectonic fault lines. The “pro tempore” elevation of Gatchalian gestures toward temporality and impermanence, themes central to Philippine modernist art’s confrontation with *hiya* (shame), *utang na loob* (debt of gratitude), and the ephemeral nature of power.
More pointedly, the political theater recalls the social realist tradition of artists like Antipas Delotavo, Edgar Talusan Fernandez, and Neil Doloricon. Their works—depicting the grotesque symbiosis of elite power and mass suffering—critique how Philippine institutions function as elaborate stage sets for intra-elite contestation. The Senate schism is not about ideology or the people’s will but about *who gets to hold the gavel*—a symbol as potent in art as the *kris* or colonial rifle. In Delotavo’s *The Quorum* (if one imagines a hypothetical work in that spirit), twelve shadowy senators might be rendered in chiaroscuro, their faces merging into a hydra-like entity, while a spectral Cayetano figure hovers above, claiming eternal presence. The artwork would expose the esoteric truth: Philippine democracy often operates as *wayang kulit* (shadow play), where the real drama occurs in the flickering interplay of light, projection, and unseen hands.
Esoteric Interregnum and the Void in Contemporary Practice
Contemporary Philippine installation and performance art deepen this critique. Artists like Santiago Bose, with his syncretic blending of indigenous motifs, colonial debris, and political satire, exposed power as bricolage. The current Senate crisis is precisely such a bricolage: fragments of the 1987 Constitution, Senate Rules, personal ambition, and public spectacle welded into an unstable whole. Similarly, installation artists such as Alfredo Aquilizan or the collective *Sanggawa* create works using accumulated objects that speak to migration, accumulation, and collapse. The “vacated” positions and committee chairmanships declared on June 3 represent a literal emptying of symbolic furniture—an institutional *tabula rasa* that performance artists might reenact through empty chairs, mirrored podiums, or divided chambers.
Philosophically, this nexus approaches a Heideggerian *Unheimlichkeit* (uncanniness). The Senate, the supposed bastion of *logos* and deliberation, becomes unhomely to itself. The quorum threshold—13 as the sacred number of completion—functions as a ritual failure, akin to the broken cosmologies in Indigenous Philippine art (e.g., the *bulul* rice guardians that lose efficacy when improperly invoked). When the ritual (the session) fails to achieve the required number, the spirits of the institution rebel, producing two rival claimants. This is the esoteric core: legitimacy is not arithmetical but *performative-magical*. It depends on collective *paniniwala* (belief), the same force that animates both religious processions and political rallies in Philippine culture.
Critical Implications: Art as Diagnostic of Democratic Malaise
A critical reading through Philippine art reveals the Senate crisis as symptomatic of a deeper postcolonial pathology: the perpetual deferral of genuine *sovereignty*. The nation, long depicted in Amorsolo’s golden harvests as harmonious and bountiful, has always contained its shadow—Rizal’s *Sisa* (madness born of colonial trauma), the revolutionary blood of the Katipunan, and the weeping wounds of EDSA’s unfulfilled promises. The Gatchalian-Cayetano duality is but the latest iteration of this divided self.
In the end, Philippine art does not merely illustrate the crisis; it *anticipates and transcends* it. It suggests that true resolution lies not in Supreme Court arbitration or backroom deals, but in a re-founding that acknowledges the hybrid, wounded, and spiritually layered nature of Filipino power. Until then, the Senate remains a living artwork in the tradition of the *Kultura*—unfinished, contested, and radiating with dangerous beauty. Like the best of Philippine art, this political moment forces us to confront the abyss between what institutions claim to be and what they actually are: fragile constellations of human will, forever one vote short of transcendence.
Fractured Gavel, Spectral Canvas: The Esoteric Schism of Senate Legitimacy as Living Philippine Art
Curatorial Frame
As a practicing installation artist and cultural worker who has curated exhibitions interrogating power's fragile architectures—from abandoned legislative halls reimagined with *bulul* guardians to performance pieces where participants reenact quorum rituals with empty chairs—I approach this Senate crisis not as distant reportage but as a living artwork demanding curatorial stewardship. The events of June 3–4, 2026, in which twelve senators convened, declared a quorum (invoking precedents like the Avelino case to base it on 22 rather than 24 members), vacated key positions, and elevated Senator Sherwin "Win" Gatchalian as Senate President Pro Tempore and Acting Senate President, while Alan Peter Cayetano insists on his "legitimate, legal, moral" continuity, constitute a profound ontological performance.
This is Philippine art in extremis: hybrid, contested, bricolaged from colonial blueprints, indigenous animism, and martial-law scars. It recalls the luminous idealism of Fernando Amorsolo's rural idylls—those golden harvests masking feudal tensions—shattered by the raw, windswept displacement in Benedicto "BenCab" Cabrera's *Sabel* series. Here, the Senate becomes Sabel: a bundled, spectral figure caught between belonging and exile, two claimants wrapped in the same institutional rags.
**Humane Anecdote from the Studio:** Years ago, while installing a piece titled *Quorum of Shadows* at a pop-up space in Quiapo, I watched street vendors haggle over *anting-anting* amulets. One elder remarked, "Power is like a borrowed *kris*—sharp until the hand that holds it trembles." That tremor defines this moment. Gatchalian's declarative "I am the Acting Senate President" is a performative speech act, Austinian in felicity yet haunted by failure conditions. Cayetano's counter-ritual—convening rival hearings, issuing conflicting memoranda on work arrangements—mirrors the ironic duality in José T. Joya's abstract expressionist canvases: vibrant surfaces concealing tectonic ruptures.
Esoterically, this crisis unveils the *anito* within the institution. Philippine democracy, grafted from American bicameralism onto a postcolonial rhizome of *utang na loob*, familial *dang*, and Catholic processional theater, has always been animist. The quorum threshold—thirteen as a mystical completion—fails like an improperly invoked *bulul*, birthing twin spirits: one "pro tempore" (temporary, contingent), the other "moral-eternal." This echoes the Kaisahan collective's 1970s social realist manifesto, where artists like Antipas Delotavo, Neil Doloricon, and Edgar Talusan Fernandez rejected "art for art's sake" for art that "reflects the true conditions" of exploitation. Their murals depicted elite hydras; today's Senate is such a hydra, heads turned against itself while flood-control probes and impeachment shadows loom.
**Ironic Critique:** How delightfully absurd—the "Upper House" reduced to a lower farce of padlocked chambers, work-from-home edicts, and dueling memoranda. Cayetano warns of constitutional crisis and protests; Gatchalian's bloc shrugs with procedural pragmatism. This is not statesmanship but *komiks* villainy, poignant in its humanity. Senators, like all of us cultural workers, are flawed vessels: ambitious, relational, trapped in cycles of *hiya* and reinvention. The humor lies in the pomp—gavels as scepters, robes as *barong*—while the poignancy resides in deferred public good. Flood victims wait as elders bicker over seating charts.
**Disconfirming the Alternative on Its Merits and Premise:**
The Cayetano camp's premise—that strict arithmetic (13 of 24) renders the June 3 actions void—rests on positivist legalism and moral continuity. On merits, this view falters empirically and philosophically. Precedents like the 1949 Avelino case affirm flexible quorum interpretation amid boycott-induced paralysis; insisting on an immutable 13/24 ignores the *de facto* boycott by the majority bloc, which itself disrupts institutional function. Morally, claiming "eternal legitimacy" smacks of the very elitism social realists critiqued: a *translatio imperii* that preserves personal *dang* over collective deliberation. It disconfirms itself through inaction—boycotting sessions while decrying crisis—revealing performative obstruction rather than principled stewardship. The alternative premise collapses under its own weight: legitimacy is not a static relic but a living praxis. Gatchalian's move, however bold, enacts the revolutionary aesthetics of Kaisahan: disrupting form to reveal content. The "coup" label is ironic theater; true illegitimacy lies in paralysis that starves governance. As cultural gatekeeper, I disconfirm this stasis on aesthetic merits alone—stagnant art dies; contested art evolves.
This frame, humane in its empathy for actors ensnared by history, esoteric in its spirit-logic, and critical in its call for re-founding, positions the crisis as curatorial prompt: an invitation to artists to intervene, to fill the void with mirrors, empty gavels, and projected *Sabel* shadows.
Curatorial Narrative Critiquing
In curating *Fractured Gavel, Spectral Canvas*, one confronts the Senate schism as a masterwork of unintended institutional critique. The narrative arc unfolds thus: a chamber of *logos* devolves into agonistic spectacle, mirroring the trajectory of Philippine art from Amorsolo's harmonious *lumad* landscapes—idealized yet complicit in colonial romanticism—to the lacerating social realism of the Kaisahan group, where power's grotesque symbiosis is laid bare.
Critically, both claimants embody the postcolonial trap Benedict Anderson termed "cacique democracy": elite factions rotating privilege while the *masa* spectates. Gatchalian's elevation performs a radical rupture, akin to BenCab's layered distortions that refuse singular identity. Yet it risks replicating the very patronage it disrupts. Cayetano's moral stance, while poignant in invoking continuity amid "coup" accusations, ironically echoes martial-law justifications of stability over reform. The critique bites deepest in the human cost: stalled Blue Ribbon hearings on flood control expose how intra-elite *thumos* drowns public welfare.
Esoterically, the void—vacated chairs, conflicting memos—is pregnant with potential. As installation practitioner, I envision filling it with participatory works: senators' portraits overlaid with *anting-anting*, viewers voting via *balota* on legitimacy. Humor tempers the irony; the "acting" president presides over an empty house, like Joya's abstracts where color promises coherence but delivers fracture.
This narrative critiques not individuals but the system: a democracy whose art has long diagnosed its ailments yet whose politics resists the cure. Resolution demands not judicial fiat but collective re-imagining—a new canvas where quorum becomes communion.
Expanded Summative
Synthesizing the crisis through Philippine art yields a summative ontology: legitimacy as palimpsest, power as performance, institution as haunted *retablo*. Amorsolo's idealism provides the underlayer—romantic nationhood—overpainted by modernist abstraction (Joya) and realist protest (Kaisahan), culminating in contemporary installation's participatory voids.
The Gatchalian-Cayetano duality is poignant anecdote writ large: two capable public servants, products of dynastic yet reform-minded lineages, trapped in a script older than the Republic. Esoterically, it signals the *interregnum* Heraclitus might recognize—one cannot enter the same Senate twice. Critically, it indicts the failure of EDSA's promise: elite rotation without structural transcendence. Ironic humor abounds in the press conferences and warnings, yet humane empathy reminds us these are men, not archetypes, navigating *utang* and ambition.
Disconfirming rigid legalism opens space for pragmatic evolution, as art evolves forms. As gatekeeper, I advocate exhibitions that render the invisible visible: spectral gavels, quorum rituals with 12 + 1 shadow. The summative hope lies in art's diagnostic and prophetic role—diagnosing fracture, prophesying hybrid renewal.
Philippine cultural workers must curate this moment: not neutral observers but active weavers of new narratives, where the Senate's schism becomes catalyst for a more reflexive, inclusive polity. The gavel fractures; the canvas endures, enigmatic and exact.
**Full Integrated Essay Footnotes** (Embedded inline as superscripts in conceptual text above; expanded here for clarity):
¹ Senate proceedings, June 3, 2026 (PNA reports).
² BenCab, *Sabel* series, discussed in Guillermo's *Social Realism*.
³ Joya abstracts, BSP Collection analysis.
⁴ Kaisahan Manifesto, 1976.
⁵ Avelino precedent invocation.
⁶ Anderson, *Spectre of Comparison*.
References
Cayetano, Alan Peter. Statements on Senate legitimacy. June 3–4, 2026. Philippine News Agency and ABS-CBN reports.
Flores, Patrick D. "Social Realism: The Turns of a Term in the Philippines." *Afterall Journal* 48 (2019).
Guillermo, Alice G. *Social Realism in the Philippines*. Manila: Asphodel, 1987.
Joya, José T. Works in Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Collection. Manila, 1976–.
Philippine Senate Leadership Crisis. Wikipedia and news aggregates, June 2026.
---
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09053027965. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™' s connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan's art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs and prompts. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility.The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
Comments