125 Projects
125 Projects October 22, 2026
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
October 23, 2026
TARZEER PICTURES PRESENTSSPECTRAL SPECTATORINFINITE FUTURES BECOME A SINGLE PAST.
Description of the Installation (from the provided video + stills, 125 Projects, 22 Oct 2026)Four large, slightly raked LED/panel screens form a continuous horizontal band leaning against the gallery wall. The panels cycle through abstract, high-contrast, glitchy imagery dominated by deep blues, violets, cyan, and pure white:- Particle/star-field fields and swirling digital “dust”
- Silhouetted human figures (standing, gesturing, or in motion)
- Fragmented architectural or structural elements
- Soft, cloud-like or ethereal washes
- Occasional bright white fields that flood the left panel
Cyan/teal ambient light spills across the concrete floor and reflects off the screens, creating a cool, immersive atmosphere. A simple wooden bench sits in front for viewing. Visitors move through the space, some pausing to watch, others photographing or walking past. The overall effect is cinematic, slightly unstable, and spectral—imagery that feels both archival and futuristic, as if multiple timelines are collapsing into one continuous loop.
A Critique
- The title and tagline land cleanly. “Spectral Spectator” + “Infinite futures become a single past” give the work an immediate conceptual hook: the viewer is both ghost and observer of collapsed temporalities.
- The multi-panel format works well. The slight rake and continuous band create a cinematic “widescreen” presence without needing a black-box theater. The glitch/particle aesthetic reinforces the idea of unstable, overlapping timelines.
- Atmosphere is strong. The cyan wash + low ambient light makes the room feel like a liminal space rather than a standard white-cube gallery. The bench invites sustained looking, which the looping, non-narrative imagery rewards.
- Technical execution looks solid for a multi-screen piece—bright, saturated panels that hold their own in a lit gallery.
- From the footage, the imagery remains quite abstract and repetitive. Silhouettes and particle fields recur without clear progression or variation in density/intensity. After a few minutes the loop can feel static rather than accumulating meaning.
- The human figures appear mostly as generic silhouettes. Stronger differentiation (specific gestures, clothing, or interactions between panels) would deepen the “spectator” theme—who is watching whom across time?
- Sound is not evident in the provided clips. A subtle, evolving audio layer (or deliberate silence) would either heighten the spectral quality or reveal whether the piece is meant to be purely visual.
- Spatial relationship: the screens sit low and lean. While this creates intimacy, it also means taller viewers look slightly downward. A more vertical or freestanding configuration might have increased monumentality.
A focused, atmospheric multi-channel video installation that successfully marries a poetic concept (collapsed futures → single past) with a cool, immersive visual language. It is more mood piece than narrative or didactic work. At its best it evokes the feeling of watching ghosts of possible futures flicker and dissolve. A tighter edit of the source material or clearer differentiation between the four panels would push it from evocative to truly haunting. As installed at 125 Projects it functions well as a contemplative environment rather than a spectacle.
How to Improve “Spectral Spectator”
Here are concrete, high-impact ways to strengthen the piece while staying true to its core idea (“infinite futures become a single past” + spectral spectatorship).
1. Tighten the Edit & Create Clearer Temporal Arc
- Right now the four panels feel relatively static and interchangeable.
- Improve by:
- Establishing a slow, irreversible progression across a 8–12 minute loop (or longer if the space allows).
- Left panel starts densest with “future” particle fields and bright white flashes → middle panels introduce more defined silhouettes and architectural fragments → right panel becomes increasingly degraded, archival, almost monochrome.
- Introduce occasional moments of near-synchrony (all panels briefly show the same figure or the same particle burst) so the collapse of timelines is felt, not just stated.
2. Differentiate the Four Screens More Sharply
- Give each panel a distinct “voice” or temporal register:
- Panel 1: pure, high-resolution “possible futures” (sharp particles, clean light).- Panel 2: transitional, glitchy, mid-resolution.
- Panel 3: heavily compressed / VHS-style degradation.
- Panel 4: almost completely dissolved into noise or single lingering after-images.
- This makes the horizontal band read as a single timeline rather than four parallel feeds.
3. Strengthen the Human Presence
- The silhouettes are currently too generic.
- Options:
- Use a small cast of recurring figures with distinctive silhouettes or micro-gestures (one always looking over their shoulder, one reaching, one seated, etc.).
- Occasionally reverse the spectator relationship: a figure on one panel appears to look directly at the viewer or at a figure on an adjacent panel.
- Add very subtle facial detail or clothing that ages/degrades across the panels so the same “person” is visibly travelling through time.
4. Sound Design (Currently Missing or Inaudible)
- Silence is a valid choice, but the piece would gain enormously from a carefully designed audio layer.
- Suggestions:
- Low, continuous sub-bass drone that slowly shifts pitch.
- Sparse, high-frequency particle “clicks” and crystalline textures that densify or thin in parallel with the visuals.
- Occasional distant human sounds (breath, a single footstep, a muffled voice) that feel like they are coming from inside the screens rather than the room.
- Keep volume low so it remains ambient and never becomes a soundtrack.
5. Spatial & Installation Refinements
- Raise the screens 20–30 cm so the centre line sits closer to eye level for standing viewers.
- Consider a very slight curve or staggered depth so the panels feel less like a flat billboard.
- Add a second, smaller bench or floor cushions at a different distance so people can choose intimate vs. contemplative viewing.
- If possible, dim the track lighting further or put it on a very slow fade cycle so the cyan spill from the screens becomes the dominant light source at certain moments.
6. Conceptual Amplification (Without Over-Explaining)- A single, almost invisible wall text addition or a short printed card could help:“Four simultaneous temporal registers. The future arrives already as residue.”- Or leave the existing tagline alone and let the improved formal structure do the work.
Priority Order (Biggest Impact First)
1. Sharper differentiation + temporal progression across the four panels2. Sound design3. More specific human figures / micro-narratives4. Installation height and seating adjustmentsThese changes would move the work from a strong atmospheric mood piece into something that actively stages the collapse of time rather than merely illustrating it. The poetic core is already excellent; the improvements are mostly about making that poetry more legible and more physically felt.
About the Author...
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan (born 1972, Mandaluyong City, Philippines) is a multidisciplinary Filipino visual artist, printmaker, painter, independent curator, researcher, writer, and cultural worker whose practice has unfolded since the mid-to-late 1990s. He is not primarily defined by discrete artworks but by sustained engagement with the full ecology of Philippine contemporary art: production, exhibition-making, documentation, pedagogy, criticism, artist development, and the often-invisible labor that sustains cultural infrastructure.
Educated in Studio Painting (BA Fine Arts and Certificate of Fine Arts) at the University of the Philippines Diliman (roughly 1993–1998), Roldan’s practice quickly expanded beyond painting into printmaking, photography, installation, writing, and curatorial work. Early recognition included an Honourable Mention from the Art Association of the Philippines (1995) and international print exhibitions: the 1996 Japan-Asia Print Exhibition at the Fukuoka Prefectural Museum and the 4th Triennial Mondiale d’Estampes Petit Format in Chamalières, France (1998). His prints from this period addressed socially charged subjects, including HIV/AIDS work beginning around 1995, and titles such as Mga OCWs Galing Pinas, Karaoke Queen, Mga Tinikling Dancers ng Pinas, Wealth, Liberate, Permanence, and Abundance. These works treat printmaking as a vehicle for social commentary, cultural documentation, and reflection on Filipino identity, marginality, labor, and everyday experience.
A pivotal chapter came with the 2003–2004 Asian Cultural Council (ACC) Starr Foundation Fellowship. Roldan spent approximately ten months in the United States, working in association with the International Studio and Curatorial Program (ISCP) in New York—where he was among the early Filipino participants—and the Experimental Printmaking Institute in Pennsylvania. He also held a Chashama studio residency in Tribeca. The fellowship enabled observation of contemporary practices, dialogue with international artists and curators, and production of new work that linked local concerns with global contexts. More recently, his piece Bridges Beyond Borders (representing cultural collaboration and exchange) was selected as visual identity for the ACC Global Alumni Network, underscoring a two-way circulation of ideas rather than one-directional “representation” of the Philippines abroad.
Key contributions to Philippine art can be understood across interconnected dimensions:
1. Printmaking as socially engaged practice — Roldan has consistently used the medium for questions of identity, migration, popular culture, inequality, and Filipino lived experience, situating the print within a tradition that functions simultaneously as aesthetic object, document, and argument.
2. Artist-curator continuum — He has organized and curated exhibitions, documented practices, and supported artist development with institutions and spaces including Hiraya Gallery, Jorge B. Vargas Museum, Kulay Diwa Art Galleries (where he served in curatorial/directorial roles), Cultural Center of the Philippines, NCCA-related projects, Imahica Art, Gallerie Anna, and others. He has collaborated with figures such as Roberto Chabet, Brenda Fajardo, and international artists (e.g., from Studio One in Canberra, as well as practitioners from Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Korea). More recently he has worked as program/marketing director and consultant curator for art fairs and spaces (including involvement with Manila Bang Show 2024 and MOCAF 2024). For Roldan these activities are not peripheral administration but forms of creative and intellectual labor.
3. Independent curatorial culture — He founded or leads Independent Curatorial Manila (ICM), conceived as an independent/voluntary curatorial service and guide for emerging Filipino artists. This reflects a commitment to pathways outside strictly institutional structures in an ecosystem heavily reliant on informal networks, galleries, independent spaces, and personal relationships.
4. International exchange and cultural memory — Beyond the ACC fellowship, his practice emphasizes postcolonial discourse, cultural memory, social inequality, politics, religion, faith, denial, courage, and everyday Filipino life. Writing, research, archiving, and annotation form integral parts of the work; recent reflective essays (including “Cultural Workers: Not Creative?” associated with a 2025 group exhibition at ILOMOCA) explicitly challenge hierarchies that privilege object-making over documentation, facilitation, pedagogy, marketing, and infrastructure-building.
5. Art as research and infrastructure — Roldan’s trajectory is circular rather than linear: artist → researcher → curator → writer → organizer → archivist → facilitator → artist. Making exhibitions possible, mentoring, documenting overlooked histories, building counter-archives, and writing critically about the conditions of art production are treated as artistic acts in their own right. This challenges romantic notions of the solitary artist and reframes the cultural worker as central to the art ecology.
Works are held in collections including the Singapore National Gallery / Singapore Museum, Luciano Benetton Collection (Imago Mundi / Venice), Rockefeller-related holdings, Lisa H. Mackie Collection, Philippine Department of Health collection, and the Experimental Printmaking Institute. Solo exhibitions include Memoirs of Pipay (Hiraya Gallery, 1996/2000), Pasintabi (Kulay Diwa, early 2000s), and Creating Identities (UP CFA Corridor Gallery, 2014), among others; group shows span Philippine institutions and international print platforms.
In one concise framing: Amiel Gerald Roldan is an artist-curator-cultural worker whose practice connects art-making with memory, social inquiry, international dialogue, independent curation, and the construction of cultural infrastructure. His potential legacy resides equally in the artworks produced, the ideas articulated in writing and reflection, and the often-invisible relational and organizational labor that helps other artists and artworks circulate. In a Philippine contemporary art field shaped by limited institutional resources and dense interpersonal networks, that third dimension—the work of making the ecology function—may prove among the most consequential.
Recent group show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Chashama at 40 Worth Open Studios
https://chashama.org/event/40-worth-open-studios-phase-1/
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/ChiTnSEl1VN/?stkn=MWhwZmV2ZWxvYjA1NA==
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility.The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
Comments