A Satirical Essay on Legal Rights and Jurisdiction on FPRRD
Summary of the current Hague proceedings involving FPRRD
A Satirical Essay on Legal Rights and Jurisdiction on FPRRD
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
February 21, 2026
What has happened so far. Former President Rodrigo Roa Duterte submitted a written waiver declining to appear at the ICC confirmation-of-charges hearing scheduled for 23–27 February 2026. The Office of the Prosecutor has filed an objection, arguing that the waiver does not provide a compelling reason to excuse in‑person appearance and asking the Pre‑Trial Chamber to reject it.
Custody and procedural posture. Reports indicate that Duterte has been in ICC detention since his arrest in March 2025 and that the matter remains subject to pending appeals and other interlocutory steps. The Pre‑Trial Chamber must now decide whether to accept the waiver, compel appearance, or adopt alternative enforcement measures.
---
How Atty. Kaufman’s statement maps onto the ongoing pursuit
Defense framing. Kaufman’s argument—that the law permits a waiver, that the former President exercised that right, and that there are no grounds to reproach him while appeals are pending—is a procedural defense aimed at shifting the dispute from merits to form. This framing asks the Chamber to treat the waiver as a valid exercise of procedural rights rather than as a substantive concession about jurisdiction.
Prosecution response. The Prosecutor’s filing, by contrast, treats the waiver as insufficient to excuse physical appearance and emphasizes the Court’s interest in conducting an effective confirmation hearing. The prosecution’s objection foregrounds fitness and availability as factors that, in its view, weigh against accepting a unilateral waiver.
---
Legal and procedural implications for the ICC
Jurisdictional optics and legitimacy. The dispute is not only about a single hearing date; it implicates how the ICC manages high‑profile defendants who deny the Court’s competence. If the Chamber accepts a waiver premised on non‑recognition of jurisdiction, it risks signaling that a refusal to engage can be accommodated without immediate procedural consequence. If the Chamber compels appearance, it must articulate enforcement mechanisms that respect due process while preserving the Court’s authority.
Precedent and institutional practice. The Prosecutor’s claim that it “has not encountered a situation like this previously” highlights the novelty of the posture and the potential for the Chamber’s decision to set a precedent on waivers by high‑ranked political figures. The Chamber’s ruling will therefore be read as guidance for future cases involving refusal to recognize ICC jurisdiction.
---
Strategic and rhetorical dimensions
Waiver as performance. Kaufman’s statement treats the waiver as both a legal instrument and a narrative device: a way to assert agency and control the public framing of the case. The prosecution’s irritation, as noted by the defense, is itself a rhetorical fact that shapes public perception of the Court’s authority.
Enforcement choices and political fallout. If the Chamber orders compelled appearance, it faces practical and reputational choices about enforcement that could escalate political tensions. If it accepts the waiver, it must justify why procedural accommodation does not undermine accountability. Either path carries trade‑offs for the ICC’s perceived impartiality and effectiveness.
---
Public, regional, and diplomatic context
Domestic resonance. In the Philippines and among diaspora communities, the waiver and the prosecution’s objection will be interpreted through partisan and national lenses. The case’s handling will affect domestic narratives about sovereignty, accountability, and the reach of international justice.
International relations. States and international actors will watch the Chamber’s decision for signals about the ICC’s willingness to press enforcement against former heads of state. The ruling could influence cooperation, arrest‑warrant execution, and future referrals. The Court’s balancing of legal principle and pragmatic enforcement will therefore have diplomatic reverberations.
---
Concluding synthesis
Where Kaufman’s rhetoric meets institutional reality. The defense’s insistence that the waiver is lawful and unassailable places the ball squarely in the judges’ court. The prosecution’s objection reframes the issue as one of courtroom integrity and the practical needs of a confirmation hearing. The Pre‑Trial Chamber’s forthcoming decision will do more than resolve a scheduling dispute; it will articulate how the ICC navigates the tension between individual procedural choices and the Court’s mandate to adjudicate serious international crimes.
A final rhetorical note. If the aphorism holds—“A man who stands up for his rights is wiser than an eagle”—then the Chamber must decide whether wisdom in this instance is the eagle’s panoramic insistence on institutional order or the man’s grounded claim to agency. The answer will shape not only the fate of this hearing but the contours of international criminal procedure for years to come.
Ctto:
---
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09163112211. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
https://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philantrophy while working for institutions simultaneosly early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/ voluntary services entity and aims to remains so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
Comments