An Essay on Philippine Government Losses Inquiry as of 2026
An Essay on Philippine Government Losses Inquiry as of 2026
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
February 11, 2026
There is a peculiar kind of silence that follows the discovery of large numbers in public finance: a silence that sounds suspiciously like a bureaucrat clearing his throat, a lawyer leafing through a binder, and a nation collectively checking its pockets. When the ledger reads in the hundreds of billions, the question that follows is never merely arithmetic; it is metaphysical. Where did the money go? Who misread the decimal point? Did the funds sprout legs and walk to a better climate? Or did they simply evaporate into the humid air of policy promises and press releases? If one were to narrate this as an anecdote at a dinner party, the punchline would be the same: the state lost a fortune and the inquiry began — not unlike a detective story where the butler is the budget and the candlestick is a line item.
A Catalogue of Vanished Numbers
Consider the roster of absences: a bank with a missing sixty billion, another with the same round figure, a health insurer with yet another sixty billion, a deposit insurance fund with over a hundred billion, a gold reserve that reads like a treasure map, and a sovereign fund whose name evokes both myth and modernity. These are not mere digits on a spreadsheet; they are the distilled hopes of infrastructure, the latent cures for public health, the safety nets for depositors, the ballast for monetary stability, and the seed capital for national ambition. When such sums are reported as “lost,” “unaccounted for,” or “under inquiry,” the public imagination does what it always does: it invents narratives. Some narratives are conspiratorial, some bureaucratic, some tragicomic. All of them ask the same rhetorical question: what happens now?
The Ritual of Inquiry
An inquiry is a ritual with its own choreography. There are hearings, subpoenas, solemn testimonies, and the occasional dramatic pause for effect. There are committees that convene like modern-day councils of elders, each member armed with a microphone and a moral posture. There are auditors who speak in the language of reconciliations and reconciliations that speak in the language of footnotes. The ritual is comforting because it promises process; it is unsettling because process can be slow, and slowness is a kind of forgetting. The inquiry performs two functions simultaneously: it reassures the public that something is being done, and it postpones the final accounting. Is that a feature or a bug?
Anecdote: The Accountant and the Mango Tree
Permit a small anecdote. An accountant once told me, over a slice of mango and a cup of coffee, that numbers are like trees: they grow, they bear fruit, and sometimes they are hollow. He said that when he was young he balanced ledgers by hand and could tell, by the smell of the paper and the pressure of the pen, whether an entry was honest. “Now,” he sighed, “the entries are digital and the smell is gone.” He laughed, but there was a tremor in the laugh. The mango tree in his yard had been planted with funds from a municipal project that never quite sprouted. “We planted the tree,” he said, “but the irrigation was never paid for.” The tree survived, but the project did not. Is that not a parable for public finance? Projects planted without water, funds allocated without follow-through, and trees that survive on the goodwill of neighbors rather than the efficiency of systems.
Satire as a Civic Tool
Satire is not merely mockery; it is a civic thermometer. It measures the fever of public life and reports back in a language that is both biting and clarifying. To satirize the loss of billions is to insist on the absurdity of opacity. Imagine a press release that reads: “In a routine audit, the government discovered that several large sums had been reclassified as ‘temporarily misplaced for strategic reasons.’” Would we laugh or cry? The laugh is a defense mechanism; the cry is a civic demand. Satire asks: if money could be misplaced, could it also be politely returned with a note of apology and a receipt?
Rhetorical Questions and the Public Imagination
Rhetorical questions are the scaffolding of public discourse when facts are scarce and feelings are abundant. What happens now? Do we convene a tribunal of economists, poets, and retired judges to adjudicate the metaphysics of missing funds? Do we launch a truth commission that issues a report in iambic pentameter? Do we rename the missing sums as “strategic reserves of optimism” and allocate them to a new ministry of hope? The absurdity of these questions is the point: they expose the gap between the language of governance and the lived reality of citizens. When the state speaks in technicalities, the citizen replies in metaphors.
The Institutional Response
Institutions respond in predictable ways. They promise transparency, they commission audits, they hold press conferences, and they sometimes appoint independent panels. These are necessary steps. Yet the efficacy of such measures depends on two variables: independence and follow-through. An audit that is independent in name but beholden in practice is a theater of accountability. A panel that issues recommendations but lacks the power to enforce them is a book without a spine. The public learns to read these rituals with a practiced eye: which committees are stacked, which auditors are truly independent, which recommendations are implemented and which are archived. The answer to “what happens now?” therefore hinges on whether the inquiry is a mechanism for truth or a mechanism for delay.
The Political Economy of Memory
Large fiscal losses are not merely financial; they are mnemonic. They shape collective memory. Will this episode be remembered as a scandal that reformed institutions, or as an episode that taught the public to be cynical? Memory is a political commodity. Governments can attempt to shape it through narratives of reform and renewal; opposition can shape it through narratives of negligence and malfeasance. Civil society, meanwhile, attempts to preserve the facts, to keep the ledger honest. The question of what happens now is also a question of what will be remembered and how that memory will be institutionalized. Will there be legal reforms? Will there be new transparency laws? Or will the ledger be closed with a footnote and a promise?
Practicalities: Recovery, Reform, and Restitution
Practical answers exist alongside rhetorical ones. Recovery of funds requires forensic accounting, legal action, and international cooperation if assets have crossed borders. Reform requires changes in procurement, stronger internal controls, and a culture that rewards whistleblowing rather than punishing it. Restitution requires political will and legal clarity. But these are not merely technical tasks; they are political choices. Do we prioritize recovery at the expense of immediate service delivery? Do we pursue prosecutions that may destabilize institutions? Each choice has trade-offs. The rhetorical question “what happens now?” thus becomes a policy question: what balance do we strike between justice, stability, and the urgent needs of the present?
Esoteric Musings on Gold and Myth
There is something esoteric about gold reserves and sovereign funds. They carry the aura of alchemy: raw metal and paper promises transmuted into national security. When a gold reserve is reported as diminished, the public imagines vaults, safes, and perhaps a dragon. When a sovereign fund named after a legendary figure is questioned, the imagination conjures both myth and modernity. The esoteric dimension matters because it shapes the tone of the inquiry. Are we dealing with mundane bookkeeping errors, or with the symbolic heart of national sovereignty? The answer affects public sentiment. A missing gold reserve is not merely a balance sheet item; it is a wound to national pride.
Anecdote: The Barangay Treasurer
Another anecdote: a barangay treasurer once told me that the most dangerous thing in public finance is not theft but complacency. “People steal,” she said, “but people also forget to check.” Her story was small-scale: a petty cash fund that ballooned into a mystery because receipts were not kept and signatures were not verified. The lesson scales up: systems that rely on trust without verification are vulnerable. The inquiry into large-scale losses is therefore also an inquiry into the mundane practices of governance: who signs the checks, who reconciles the accounts, who asks the awkward questions at the right time?
What Happens Now: A Modest Prescription
If one were to answer the question with a blend of satire and seriousness, the prescription would be modest and procedural. First, ensure truly independent forensic audits with public reporting. Second, strengthen legal frameworks for asset recovery and whistleblower protection. Third, implement procurement reforms that reduce single-source contracts and increase competitive bidding. Fourth, invest in public financial management systems that make transactions traceable in real time. Fifth, cultivate a civic culture that values transparency not as a slogan but as a daily practice. These steps are not glamorous, but they are the plumbing of democracy. Without them, the next inquiry will be the same play with different actors.
Closing Rhetorical Flourish
So what happens now? The answer is both banal and profound: the country will hold hearings, the cameras will roll, the pundits will pontificate, and the ledgers will be examined. Some money may be recovered, some reforms may be enacted, and some reputations may be repaired or ruined. But beyond the immediate theatrics, the deeper question remains: will this episode change how the public and the state relate to each other? Will it teach us to demand better accounting, to insist on independent oversight, and to treat public funds as sacred rather than fungible? Or will it become another anecdote, told at dinner parties, a cautionary tale that elicits a rueful laugh and then fades?
If the mango tree taught the accountant anything, it was this: trees need water, and ledgers need attention. The nation needs both. The inquiry is the moment when attention is focused; what follows will determine whether the water returns to the roots or the tree survives on the occasional rain of rhetoric. In the end, the rhetorical question is also an invitation: to citizens, to institutions, and to the curious accountants who still smell the paper. What happens now is not only a matter of policy; it is a test of civic imagination. Will we imagine a system that keeps its books, or will we continue to imagine that numbers can simply disappear and be replaced by better stories?
---
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09163112211. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
https://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philantrophy while working for institutions simultaneosly early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/ voluntary services entity and aims to remains so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
-
Comments