The Suspension of Representation in Dasmariñas: Constitutional Critique and Esoteric Reflections
The Suspension of Representation in Dasmariñas: Constitutional Critique and Esoteric Reflections
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
February 7, 2026
Introduction
The premise of Dasmariñas, a major city in Cavite, existing without a practicing Representative due to political suspension exceeding sixty days, raises profound constitutional, political, and philosophical questions. Representation is not merely a procedural mechanism; it is the very embodiment of the democratic covenant between the governed and the governing. To suspend a Representative for political matters—whether disciplinary, punitive, or strategic—creates a lacuna in the democratic fabric. This essay interrogates the constitutional implications of such suspension, critiques the political matter underlying it, and explores leeways for resisting its enforcement. It further examines the distinction between culpable violations of the Constitution and crimes, situating the Dasmariñas case within broader debates on sovereignty, legitimacy, and institutional accountability.
---
I. Representation as a Constitutional Imperative
The Philippine Constitution enshrines representation as a fundamental right of the people. Article VI establishes the House of Representatives as the direct voice of districts and sectors. The absence of a Representative for Dasmariñas, whether temporary or prolonged, undermines this constitutional guarantee. Representation is not ornamental; it is constitutive of sovereignty. To deprive a constituency of its voice in Congress is to silence a segment of the sovereign people.
Suspension of a Representative for more than sixty days, particularly when rooted in political maneuvering, risks transforming constitutional safeguards into instruments of exclusion. The Constitution allows disciplinary measures, but these must be tempered by proportionality and necessity. A prolonged suspension becomes punitive not only to the Representative but to the constituency itself, which is denied participation in legislative deliberation.
---
II. Political Matters and the Problem of Overreach
The suspension of a Representative often arises from political matters—conflicts within the chamber, accusations of misconduct, or partisan disputes. Yet political matters are notoriously elastic. They can be invoked to justify disciplinary action beyond the bounds of necessity. In Dasmariñas, the invocation of political grounds for suspension exemplifies this elasticity. The Representative is silenced, but so too are the people.
This overreach reflects a deeper pathology: the conflation of institutional discipline with political expediency. When political matters become grounds for suspension, the line between legitimate accountability and partisan suppression blurs. The danger lies not only in the immediate silencing of Dasmariñas but in the precedent it sets: that representation can be suspended at will, subject to the vagaries of political conflict.
---
III. The Constitutional Distinction: Crimes vs. Culpable Violations
The Constitution recognizes culpable violations as grounds for impeachment and accountability. Yet not all culpable violations are crimes. Plunder, treason, rebellion—these are crimes codified in law. But a culpable violation of the Constitution may consist of acts that, while not criminal, undermine constitutional order. For instance, betrayal of public trust or abuse of legislative procedure may not be crimes per se, but they are culpable violations.
This distinction is crucial in the Dasmariñas case. The suspension of a Representative for political matters may be framed as a disciplinary measure, but it risks becoming a culpable violation of the Constitution itself. By depriving a constituency of representation, Congress undermines the constitutional guarantee of popular sovereignty. Such deprivation is not criminal in the penal sense, but it is culpable in the constitutional sense.
---
IV. The Suspension as Constitutional Injury
The injury inflicted by suspension is twofold: institutional and communal. Institutionally, the House of Representatives loses the voice of one district, distorting deliberation and decision-making. Communally, the people of Dasmariñas are disenfranchised, denied their constitutional right to participate in governance through their Representative.
This injury cannot be justified by political matters alone. Discipline must be proportionate, and suspension beyond sixty days exceeds proportionality. It transforms discipline into disenfranchisement. The Constitution does not authorize the silencing of constituencies; it authorizes accountability of individuals. To conflate the two is to commit a culpable violation.
---
V. Critique of Political Expediency
Political expediency often masquerades as constitutional discipline. In reality, it is a form of instrumentalism: using constitutional mechanisms to achieve partisan ends. The suspension of Dasmariñas’ Representative exemplifies this instrumentalism. It is less about accountability than about silencing dissent, consolidating power, or signaling dominance.
Such expediency corrodes constitutional culture. It teaches that representation is conditional, subject to political favor. It undermines trust in institutions, erodes legitimacy, and fosters cynicism. The people of Dasmariñas, deprived of representation, may rightly perceive the suspension as betrayal rather than discipline.
---
VI. Leeways Against Enforcement
Is there a leeway for resisting enforcement of such suspension? The Constitution itself provides avenues. Judicial review offers one: the Supreme Court may be petitioned to examine whether suspension violates constitutional guarantees. While the Court traditionally respects the internal rules of Congress, it cannot abdicate its duty to protect representation. A prolonged suspension may be challenged as unconstitutional disenfranchisement.
Another leeway lies in political mobilization. The people of Dasmariñas may assert their right to representation through protest, petition, and advocacy. Sovereignty resides in the people, and suspension cannot extinguish this sovereignty. By mobilizing, the constituency reclaims its voice, even in the absence of formal representation.
A third leeway is interpretive: reimagining suspension not as absolute silence but as temporary limitation. Congress may be compelled to allow alternative forms of representation—delegated voting, advisory participation, or constituency consultation. While imperfect, such alternatives mitigate the injury of suspension.
---
VII. Comparative Constitutional Reflections
Globally, the suspension of representatives has been contested. In parliamentary systems, suspension is often limited to brief periods, ensuring proportionality. In presidential systems, prolonged suspension is rare, as it undermines the balance of powers. The Dasmariñas case thus stands out as excessive. Comparative reflection underscores the need for restraint: representation must be preserved, even amidst discipline.
---
VIII. Philosophical Dimensions: Representation as Presence
Beyond legal critique, the suspension raises philosophical questions. Representation is not merely voting; it is presence. The Representative embodies the constituency in deliberation. To suspend the Representative is to erase presence, to render the constituency absent. This absence is ontological: the people of Dasmariñas cease to exist within the legislative body.
Such erasure is intolerable in a democracy. Sovereignty requires presence. Without presence, sovereignty is hollow. The suspension thus becomes not only a constitutional injury but a metaphysical one: the people are rendered invisible.
---
IX. The Esoteric Dimension: Silence as Violence
In esoteric terms, silence is not neutral; it is violence. To silence a constituency is to negate its existence. The suspension of Dasmariñas’ Representative enacts this violence. It is a ritual of exclusion, a symbolic erasure. The people are present in reality but absent in representation. This absence distorts the symbolic order of democracy.
Esoterically, representation is a ritual of voice. Each Representative speaks not only for constituents but for the sovereign people. Suspension disrupts this ritual, creating a void. The void is dangerous: it invites authoritarianism, cynicism, and despair. To resist suspension is to resist the void, to reclaim voice against silence.
---
X. Toward Constitutional Reform
The Dasmariñas case suggests the need for constitutional reform. Suspension must be limited, proportionate, and subject to judicial review. Constituencies must never be deprived of representation. Reform may include:
- Limiting suspension to thirty days, ensuring proportionality.
- Mandating judicial review of suspensions exceeding fifteen days.
- Providing alternative mechanisms of representation during suspension.
Such reforms preserve discipline while protecting sovereignty. They ensure that representation remains inviolable, even amidst political conflict.
---
XI. Conclusion: Reclaiming Voice
The suspension of Dasmariñas’ Representative for political matters exceeding sixty days is a constitutional injury, a political overreach, and an esoteric violence. It deprives a constituency of voice, undermines sovereignty, and erases presence. While culpable violations of the Constitution are not always crimes, this suspension constitutes a culpable violation: it undermines the constitutional guarantee of representation.
Judicial review, political mobilization, interpretive alternatives, and constitutional reform. These leeways resist enforcement, reclaim voice, and preserve sovereignty. Ultimately, representation is inviolable. To suspend it is to betray democracy. Dasmariñas must not be silenced; its voice must resonate within the halls of Congress, as a reminder that sovereignty resides in the people, and the people cannot be erased.
--
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09163112211. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.
Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders
His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.
Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.
Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.
Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan’s art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.
Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
https://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philantrophy while working for institutions simultaneosly early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/ voluntary services entity and aims to remains so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
Comments