Legality of Confidential and Intelligence Funds
Legality of Confidential and Intelligence Funds
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
February 21, 2026
In a country where the rule of law and the secrecy of operations walk hand in hand, where does legitimate authority end and mystery begin? The Confidential and Intelligence Funds (CIF) are an institutional reality in our national budget: they are specified in the General Appropriations Act (GAA) and allocated to offices for expenditures that cannot be disclosed because of security, intelligence, or other sensitive operational reasons. Is this legal? Yes — in the letter of the law and within the structure of government, CIF has a legitimate basis. But the more intriguing question is this: is it legal in the spirit of democracy and public accountability?
CIF is not the personal money of any official; it is state funds managed by the head of the office or agency and subject to government accounting rules. Yet why does a fund with a clear legal basis still provoke so many questions and jokes in political corners and academic coffeehouses? Can something designed to be secret ever be truly transparent?
---
The Paradox of Secrecy and Accountability and the Fund’s Purposes
A little academic joke: how do you measure the transparency of something that is intentionally hidden? CIF is a perfect example of a paradox: its purpose is to protect national security and conduct operations that, if revealed, could harm the country; yet concealing details opens the door to potential abuse. Who watches the watchers?
In theory, the Commission on Audit (COA) serves as the watchdog: it audits, requires documentation, and reports. In practice, parts of the audit remain classified. Which is more important: protecting operations or the public’s right to know how the nation’s money is spent? Isn’t democracy built on balancing these two principles?
The CIF is intended for four main purposes:
- Intelligence operations — surveillance of criminality and threats to the nation.
- Security and protection — safeguarding officials and sensitive facilities.
- Sensitive government transactions — emergency procurement and undercover initiatives.
- Special missions — diplomatic, anti-terror, or anti-corruption activities.
If CIF is used for genuine national interest, it is a powerful instrument. But what if a “special mission” becomes a “special favor”? What mechanisms prevent a shift from national security to personal gain?
---
Anecdote and Rhetorical Questions
One day at a small eatery in Manila, two veteran auditors were having coffee. “You know,” one said, “CIF is like an umbrella in the rainy season: you need it when it rains, but if you don’t store it properly, you’ll lose it.” “Right,” replied the other, “and if you use it to plant flowers in your yard, it’s no longer an umbrella — it’s a garden.” The joke reveals a simple truth: the fund has a rightful use, but its use requires strict ethics and clear oversight.
Isn’t it curious that a fund designed for secrecy has more public commentators than many other parts of the budget? Who should ask questions when anomalies arise? What should citizens do when transparency is limited for legitimate reasons? Above all, how do we ensure CIF does not become a shadow of power?
---
Satirical Lens on Budgetary Drama
If the national budget were a play, CIF would be the scene behind a black curtain: there are lights and actors, but you cannot see the whole stage. On the political stage there are monologues about security and dialogues about accountability. The satirical question is: who wrote the script, and who audits the scriptwriter?
An academic quip: if CIF were a book, its title would be “Secrets Spent for the Good of the Nation.” But who reads the pages? COA, of course — yet the pages are locked. And the key? It rests with the office head. Doesn’t the process resemble a Kafkaesque novel: legal basis, audit procedures, yet the outcome remains a mystery to the public?
---
Practical Implications and Proposals
Beneath the satire lies a serious issue. Here are practical proposals that do not violate the need for secrecy but strengthen accountability:
- Clearer classification rules — define in greater detail what information must remain classified and for how long.
- Independent oversight panels — panels with access to classified details but mandated to report general findings publicly without revealing sensitive specifics.
- Periodic declassification — gradually declassify CIF expenditures that are no longer risky to disclose, enabling historical accountability.
- Stronger internal controls — tighter accounting and a clear chain of approval to prevent misuse.
These are not radical ideas; they are measures aimed at preserving the balance between secrecy and accountability.
---
Conclusion and Resolution for the Graph and Analysis
CIF is legal under our constitution and the GAA. It is an instrument of the state to protect national security and conduct sensitive operations. But legality does not automatically equal moral correctness or perfect governance. The real challenge is designing mechanisms that allow effective use of CIF while maintaining accountability and public trust. Can there be secrecy without suspicion? Can transparency exist without compromising operations? The answer lies in the art of balanced governance.
Visualization types and layout
- Primary chart: Grouped vertical bar chart showing CIF allocations by office across years (2022–2025). Each office is a group; each year is a colored bar within the group.
- Secondary chart: Stacked area or line chart to show overall trend in total CIF allocation across years.
- Color palette: Use muted but distinct colors; ensure colorblind-friendly choices.
- Annotations: Label major anomalies with callouts and short notes explaining possible reasons such as policy changes or pending data.
- Accessibility: Include a data table below the chart with exact figures and provide alt text summarizing key trends.
Axes and scales
- Y-axis: Amount in Philippine pesos (use millions or billions as unit).
- X-axis: Offices grouped; within each group, bars for 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025.
- Legend: Year-coded with consistent colors; place legend at top-right.
Brief analysis based on available allocations
- Office of the President: Constant allocation (₱4.5B annually) — indicates a stable, large CIF commitment to the executive for intelligence and national security.
- Office of the Vice President: Fluctuating allocation (₱125M in 2022; ₱375M in 2023; ₱0 in 2024–2025) — suggests episodic requests or policy changes; zero allocation in later years requires explanation.
- Department of Interior and Local Government: High but slightly declining allocation — consistent operational needs for internal security with modest reductions.
- Department of Justice: Increase then stabilization — reflects a ramp-up in sensitive law enforcement operations followed by steady-state funding.
- Department of National Defense: Notable spike in 2023 then stabilization — could reflect specific defense initiatives or classified procurement.
- Transportation, Coast Guard, NSC, NICA: Smaller allocations with notable increases in 2025 for some — may indicate expanding roles in maritime security and logistics.
- COA: Small CIF (₱10–12M) — administrative confidentiality needs rather than operational intelligence.
Interpretation and caveats
- Trends to watch: Large, stable allocations to the Office of the President; episodic spikes in defense and intelligence agencies; zero allocations for the Office of the Vice President in later years require contextual clarification.
- Caveat: CIF figures are by nature partially classified; published totals may omit granular line items. Any analysis should note data completeness and classification constraints.
Final thought: CIF is a complex part of the national budget — legal, sometimes necessary, and simultaneously a source of concern. The best approach is not to deny secrecy but to design mechanisms that ensure accountability without undermining the ability to protect the nation. In the end, the question remains: how do we show trust in a fund that is meant to be hidden?
Ctto:
---
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09163112211. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
https://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philantrophy while working for institutions simultaneosly early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/ voluntary services entity and aims to remains so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
Comments