The Senate and the Naval Officer: A Satirical Essay on Naval Leadership and Governance
The Senate and the Naval Officer: A Satirical Essay on Naval Leadership and Governance
February 10, 2026
Seaworthiness and Duty
The Senate manages diplomacy; your duty, Commodore, is to bolster the Seaworthiness, Readiness, and knowledge amongst our fleet and substations. Overreaching responsibilities, delegations and taskings is corruption in the end. Who, then, is the Commodore if not the human hinge between the Senate’s grandiloquent pronouncements and the salt-streaked reality of rope, rivet, and routine? Is the Commodore a bureaucratic cipher, a ceremonial hat, or the last honest man who remembers how to splice a line while the rest of the world argues about the color of the flag?
There is a delicious absurdity in asking a naval officer to be both philosopher and plumber, diplomat and drill sergeant. The Senate, in its august chambers, drafts treaties with the same calm with which it drafts memos; the Commodore, on the quarterdeck, translates those memos into the language of wind and wake. This translation is not merely linguistic. It is ontological: it converts the Senate’s abstracted diplomacy into the concrete practices that keep hulls intact and minds alert. Is that not the essence of governance—turning the ethereal into the executable? If so, why do we persist in treating the people who do the turning as if they were optional accessories to the state’s ceremonial wardrobe?
---
The Senate and Diplomacy
The Senate manages diplomacy with a ritualistic precision that would make a court jester weep with envy. Senators speak in measured cadences, as if every clause were a ship’s bell marking the hour. They dispatch envoys and issue communiqués that float like polished buoys on the ocean of international relations. Yet diplomacy, for all its pomp, is a practice that depends on the mundane: accurate charts, reliable engines, and crews who know when to reef the sails. How many treaties have been undermined by a single misread chart or a captain who slept through a storm?
Diplomacy without seamanship is like a map without a compass: pretty to look at, useless when the fog comes. The Senate’s proclamations are necessary; they set the course, define the port of call, and declare the moral weather. But the Commodore’s duty is to ensure that the fleet can actually reach that port. This is not a lesser task. It is the practical theology of statecraft. When the Senate speaks of alliances, does it imagine fleets as metaphors or as metal and timber that must be fed, maintained, and taught? If the Senate’s diplomacy is a poem, the Commodore’s work is the grammar that keeps the poem from collapsing into nonsense.
---
Commodore’s Charge
Commodore, you are charged with three sacred verbs: bolster, train, inform. Bolster the Seaworthiness—ensure that every hull is seaworthy, every rivet snug, every seam sealed against the sea’s appetite. Readiness is not a slogan; it is a daily liturgy of inspections, drills, and the quiet, stubborn work of replacing parts before they fail. Knowledge is the fleet’s true ammunition: charts, signals, weather lore, and the institutional memory that prevents yesterday’s mistakes from becoming tomorrow’s disasters.
Consider an anecdote: once, in a harbor that smelled of diesel and fried fish, a Commodore found a junior officer polishing a brass plaque while the bilge pump sputtered. The officer explained that the plaque was for a visiting dignitary; the pump, he said, could wait. The Commodore, with a smile that was equal parts amusement and reprimand, had the plaque moved to the back of the locker and the pump fixed. Later, when a storm came and the bilge pump saved a ship from sinking, the Commodore’s quiet prioritization became a lesson in values. Which is more diplomatic: a gleaming plaque or a ship that returns home?
This is not to romanticize the Commodore as a solitary hero. The role is inherently social. It requires delegation, yes, but delegation that is intelligent and accountable. Delegation that devolves responsibility without oversight is not delegation; it is abdication. Overreaching responsibilities, delegations and taskings is corruption in the end. When tasks are parceled out like trinkets at a fair, the chain of accountability frays. Who will answer when the compass fails and the Senate’s treaty becomes a stranded promise?
---
The Corruption of Overreach
Corruption is often imagined as a ledger of bribes and secret accounts, but there is a subtler, more insidious corruption: the corruption of purpose. When responsibilities are overreached—when the Senate claims to manage every detail and the Commodore is asked to be everything to everyone—the system becomes top-heavy and brittle. The Commodore is not a universal solvent for institutional dysfunction. Expecting one office to absorb every failure is a recipe for moral and operational bankruptcy.
Delegation, properly practiced, is the art of distributing authority while preserving clarity of responsibility. It is not the same as diffusion, where responsibility evaporates into a fog of memos and meetings. The Commodore must cultivate a culture where delegated tasks come with clear expectations, measurable outcomes, and a chain of accountability that is as visible as a mast in full sail. Otherwise, the fleet becomes a theater of blame, where every failure is a prop and every success an accident.
There is also the rhetorical corruption: the habit of using grand language to mask small competence. How often do we hear of “strategic initiatives” that are, in practice, nothing more than rebranded housekeeping? The Senate’s proclamations can be guilty of this. They can dress up logistical necessities in the finery of statesmanship. The Commodore’s duty is to call out such linguistic inflation with the gentle cruelty of someone who has seen what happens when rhetoric outruns reality. Is it not a form of corruption to let language substitute for labor?
---
Anecdotes and Esoterica
Permit a few esoteric asides, for humor is the lubricant of serious thought. There is a naval superstition that a ship will not sail if a cat is not aboard. Whether this is true is less important than the lesson it teaches: rituals matter. They bind crews together, create shared narratives, and provide a sense of continuity in a profession that is otherwise defined by change. The Senate’s rituals—oaths, debates, and ceremonial handshakes—serve a similar function. But rituals without repair manuals are like prayers without tools.
Another anecdote: a Commodore once instituted a “Question Hour” on deck, where sailors could ask anything—about navigation, about policy, about why the soup always tasted faintly of bureaucracy. The questions ranged from the practical (“How do we maintain the radio?”) to the metaphysical (“If a treaty is signed in the wind, does it make a sound?”). The exercise did more than educate; it democratized knowledge. Sailors who once felt alienated from the Senate’s distant decisions began to see themselves as participants in a shared enterprise. Is that not the point of leadership—to convert alienation into agency?
Esoterica, too, has its place. There are knots known only to a few, signals that are half-song and half-code, weather lore passed down like secret recipes. These are not mere curiosities; they are repositories of practical wisdom. The Commodore’s task is to preserve these esoteric knowledges while making them accessible. Knowledge hoarded is knowledge wasted. Knowledge shared is readiness multiplied.
---
Rhetorical Questions as Tools
Why do we ask rhetorical questions? Because they are the intellectual equivalent of a flare: they illuminate without committing to a single path. They force the listener to inhabit the question and, in doing so, to become part of the answer. In the context of naval duty and senatorial diplomacy, rhetorical questions perform a civic function. They remind us that governance is not a monologue but a conversation—sometimes a heated one—between those who legislate and those who labor.
Is the Commodore merely an executor of the Senate’s will, or is the Commodore a co-author of policy through the practice of implementation? If the Senate’s diplomacy is a map, does the Commodore not add the marginalia that make the map usable? Who, finally, will hold the line between noble intention and practical neglect?
---
Conclusion
The Senate manages diplomacy; your duty, Commodore, is to bolster the Seaworthiness, Readiness, and knowledge amongst our fleet and substations. Overreaching responsibilities, delegations and taskings is corruption in the end. This sentence, repeated like a bell, is both command and caution. It is a reminder that institutions are only as good as the practices that sustain them.
To be a Commodore is to live in the tension between the Senate’s lofty designs and the sea’s indifferent laws. It is to translate rhetoric into rivets, to convert treaties into training, and to ensure that knowledge circulates as freely as the wind. It is to resist the corruption of overreach by insisting on clarity, accountability, and the humble dignity of work. It is, in short, to be both steward and skeptic, to love ceremony but prefer the pump that keeps the ship afloat.
So, Commodore, when the Senate next issues its polished pronouncements, will you salute and recite them like scripture, or will you ask the practical questions that make diplomacy durable? Will you let delegation become diffusion, or will you insist that every task carry with it a clear line of responsibility? The sea does not care for our titles; it cares for competence. If the Senate manages diplomacy, then you, Commodore, manage the means by which diplomacy becomes real. Is that not the highest form of patriotism—turning noble words into seaworthy deeds?
Collation of Premises and Expanded Essay on Seaworthiness Readiness and Sovereignty
The Senate manages diplomacy; your duty, Commodore, is to bolster the Seaworthiness, Readiness, and knowledge amongst our fleet and substations. Overreaching responsibilities, delegations and taskings is corruption in the end. Collating the additional premises supplied — a mechanical map of Exclusive Economic Zone boundaries that would sweep in Taiwan and Sabah, public statements questioning whether patriotism is measured by confrontation or accountability, claims about the loss or retention of maritime control under different administrations, contrasting senatorial views on coordinates versus tribunal rulings, an official National Security Council restatement of the arbitral award invalidating the nine‑dash line, and a naval assessment that foreign rescue efforts were insufficient — we arrive at a richer, stranger, and more urgent set of questions. How does a Commodore translate these competing premises into practice without becoming a caricature of authority or a repository for everyone’s anxieties?
---
Mapping Claims into Duty
Maps are not merely ink on paper; they are instruments of imagination and instruments of power. The mechanical determination of an Exclusive Economic Zone that, by simple geometric extension, would encompass Taiwan and Sabah is a premise that reads like a cartographer’s joke and a diplomat’s nightmare. If a map drawn by algorithm or by legislative fiat sweeps in distant lands, what then becomes of the Commodore’s task to bolster Seaworthiness? Does the fleet prepare for a boundary that is theoretical, rhetorical, or enforceable? Is readiness measured by the number of nautical miles claimed on a chart, or by the fleet’s ability to sustain operations, protect fishermen, and respond to incidents within the maritime space that the nation actually controls and can defend?
The Senate manages diplomacy; the Commodore manages the means by which diplomacy becomes real. When a mechanical EEZ overlaps with other polities, the Commodore must ask: what resources will be committed, what risks accepted, and what legal foundations will be invoked? The National Security Council’s restatement that the nine‑dash line has no legal basis under UNCLOS is a premise that anchors one side of the argument in international law. If the arbitral award affirms the Philippines’ maritime rights, then the Commodore’s work is not to invent new maps but to operationalize the legal space that already exists. If, however, political rhetoric and mechanical cartography push for maximalist claims, the Commodore must translate those claims into feasible tasks or refuse them as corrupt overreach.
---
Patriotism, Accountability, and the Commodore’s Conscience
“Mas patriotic ako kung aatake ako sa China? At less patriotic ako kung hihingi ako ng pananagutan sa 1.5 Trillion na binulsa ng admin na ito?” This rhetorical premise reframes patriotism as a choice between confrontation and accountability. It is a premise that invites the Commodore to consider the moral economy of action: is the demonstration of national vigor measured by the spectacle of confrontation, or by the quiet, unglamorous work of ensuring that public resources are not plundered and that sailors are fed, trained, and equipped?
A Commodore who treats patriotism as a checklist of belligerent gestures risks converting the fleet into a parade ground. A Commodore who treats patriotism as stewardship converts the fleet into a public trust. Which is more corrosive to institutional integrity: the temptation to perform patriotism for cameras, or the temptation to hide incompetence behind grand narratives of sovereignty? If overreaching responsibilities and diffuse delegations are corruption in the end, then the Commodore’s ethical duty is to insist that every tasking be matched with capacity and accountability.
---
Scarborough Shoal, Tribunal Rulings, and the Politics of Memory
One premise claims that control of Scarborough Shoal was lost during one administration and that no territory was lost during another. Another premise insists that the international arbitral tribunal has resolved the matter in the Philippines’ favor and that what remains is to uphold the ruling. These are not merely competing historical claims; they are competing frameworks for action.
If the Senate’s diplomacy is a narrative of recovery and assertion, the Commodore must ask whether operational plans are being shaped by memory or by law. Does the fleet posture to reclaim what memory says was lost, or does it posture to defend what law says is ours? Is the Commodore a custodian of national memory, a practitioner of international law, or both? If the tribunal’s award is the legal anchor, then the Commodore’s readiness should align with enforcing rights recognized by that award: protecting fisheries, monitoring incursions, and ensuring safe passage. If political rhetoric insists on a different narrative, the Commodore must translate rhetoric into realistic, accountable operations or refuse to be complicit in symbolic gestures that risk lives and resources.
---
Coordinates, Defense, and the Limits of Mechanical Precision
The debate between specifying coordinates to determine the extent of the West Philippine Sea and relying on the arbitral tribunal’s ruling is a premise that pits geometric precision against juridical finality. Senator Marcoleta’s insistence on specific coordinates asks a practical question: how do we know what to defend if we cannot define it? Senator Pangilinan’s reliance on the tribunal’s ruling asks a legal question: if the law has already decided, why relitigate the map?
For the Commodore, both questions are operational. Coordinates matter because sailors need to know where to patrol, where to rescue, and where to enforce. Tribunal rulings matter because they provide legal cover and international legitimacy. The Commodore’s task is to synthesize these premises: translate legal rulings into patrol lines, convert coordinates into rules of engagement, and ensure that every patrol has a clear mandate, a clear chain of command, and a clear budget. When delegation becomes diffusion, the Commodore must insist that coordinates come with logistics and that legal victories come with operational plans.
---
Rescue, Diplomacy, and the Politics of Human Life
A naval assessment that foreign rescue efforts were insufficient is a premise that brings the human cost into sharp relief. Diplomacy and maps are abstractions until a life is at stake. If the Philippine Navy reports that rescue efforts by another state were inadequate, the Commodore must balance the diplomatic fallout with the moral imperative to save lives. Does the fleet prioritize search and rescue over signaling and posturing? Can the Commodore demand resources for humanitarian readiness even while the Senate debates sovereignty?
Here the Commodore’s duty to bolster Seaworthiness and Readiness becomes a moral imperative: pumps must work, radios must transmit, and crews must be trained for the messy business of saving people. The Commodore must ensure that the fleet’s readiness is not merely a tool of deterrence but a capacity for compassion. When the Senate manages diplomacy, the Commodore manages the practical means by which diplomacy is tested in the crucible of human need.
---
Rhetoric, Ritual, and the Esoteric Knots of Command
Rhetorical questions, ceremonial maps, and esoteric naval lore are not distractions; they are the cultural fabric of maritime life. The superstition of a ship’s cat, the ritual of a Question Hour on deck, the marginalia that sailors add to charts — these are the small practices that sustain morale and transmit tacit knowledge. The Commodore must preserve these practices while resisting the temptation to let ritual substitute for repair manuals.
If the Senate’s proclamations dress logistical necessities in the finery of statesmanship, the Commodore must translate finery into function. If the Senate’s diplomacy is a poem, the Commodore’s work is the grammar. If the map is a provocation, the Commodore’s response must be a plan. If the public conversation equates patriotism with spectacle, the Commodore must insist that patriotism also includes the unglamorous work of maintenance, training, and accountability.
---
Conclusion
The Senate manages diplomacy; your duty, Commodore, is to bolster the Seaworthiness, Readiness, and knowledge amongst our fleet and substations. Overreaching responsibilities, delegations and taskings is corruption in the end. Collated with the supplied premises, this command becomes a litany against both cartographic hubris and rhetorical inflation. A mechanical EEZ that sweeps in Taiwan and Sabah is a thought experiment that tests the limits of what a navy can reasonably be asked to defend. Public debates about patriotism and accountability force the Commodore to choose between spectacle and stewardship. Competing claims about Scarborough Shoal and the tribunal’s ruling demand that the Commodore translate law into patrols and coordinates into logistics. Reports of insufficient rescue efforts remind the Commodore that sovereignty is measured not only in miles but in lives saved.
So, Commodore, will you be the hinge that turns the Senate’s polished pronouncements into seaworthy deeds, or will you allow the fleet to be the stage upon which political theater is performed? Will you insist that every delegated task carry a clear line of responsibility, measurable outcomes, and the resources to match? The sea does not care for our narratives; it cares for competence. If the Senate manages diplomacy, then you manage the means by which diplomacy is tested, upheld, and humanely enacted. Is that not the highest form of patriotism—turning noble words into seaworthy deeds that protect both territory and the people who live by it?
--
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09163112211. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
https://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philantrophy while working for institutions simultaneosly early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/ voluntary services entity and aims to remains so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
Comments