The Thousand at the Crossing: A Philosophical Essay on People Power, Corruption, and the Bet on Change in Pasig
The Thousand at the Crossing: A Philosophical Essay on People Power, Corruption, and the Bet on Change in Pasig
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
June 30, 2026
In the sticky heat of Pasig’s Crossing — that messy crossroads where the slow-moving Pasig River meets Manila’s endless traffic and frustration — one bold statement captures centuries of thinking about power and politics:
> “Give me a thousand volunteers at Crossing, Pasig — a thousand volunteers with US support and I guarantee you before the end of the day, there will be changes. Expect it to reach a million tomorrow, and they won’t leave until the corrupt are kicked out.”
This is not just typical political talk. It is a deep claim about hidden power (*potentia*) versus official power (*potestas*), and the ordinary people’s untapped strength against a rotten, stuck government. It mixes ideas from thinkers like Machiavelli (the power of bold action) and Hannah Arendt (real politics happening when people show up together in public), all reshaped by the very Filipino talent for turning a busy street corner into the start of something revolutionary.
The Core Idea: From a Small Group to Massive Change
At heart, this statement says that numbers matter in a special way. A thousand people — not heavily armed, but simply *there*, visible, and maybe backed by outside power like the US — can spark something much bigger. Tomorrow, a million. And they stay put until the corrupt leaders are removed. This is not a polite request for gradual fixes. It is a bet on sudden, deep change from within.
It echoes the thinker Spinoza’s idea of the *multitude* — the people as a lively, energetic crowd that can reshape how power works — more than John Locke’s calmer social contract where individuals agree to be governed. Here, the crowd itself changes the rules.
Symbolically, Crossing Pasig becomes a special border zone, almost sacred yet everyday. The Pasig River, once a source of life but now heavily polluted by the powerful elite’s neglect, turns into a place where society can either sink into bitterness or cross into something renewed. The starting number of one thousand brings to mind biblical stories (Gideon’s small faithful group), Roman military units, or Mao’s idea that a small spark can start a huge fire. The hoped-for million points to what philosopher Alain Badiou calls an *event*: a sudden breakthrough of truth that bursts out of normal, resigned daily life.
Snark enters here, as it must in Philippine politics: “People Power” has become a nostalgic brand, like EDSA nostalgia. Opposition figures often invoke heroes like Ninoy Aquino while their own families chase the same old favors and money. The call feels both desperately needed and comically late. Picture the volunteers arriving with balikbayan boxes of snacks, aunties in sparkly shirts filming for social media likes, and online trolls accusing it of being “yellow” destabilization (old anti-Aquino rhetoric). Still, the idea holds: enough people, fired up the right way, turn quantity into real quality. A thousand is about logistics. A million is about changing reality itself.
Corruption as a Deep-Rooted Rot
In the Philippines, corruption is not a glitch — it *is* the system. It is a self-feeding cycle where holding public office becomes a way to grab wealth and keep power. Think of philosopher Nietzsche’s idea of *ressentiment* — resentment turned into a weapon — made official: the weak (or those who act weak) dominating through red tape, family dynasties, and the quiet threat of cutting off government help.
The corrupt don’t just steal money. They destroy the very idea of a shared public good. They turn the government into a business for extracting profit, where leaders stay in power not because people truly agree, but because everyone assumes “this is just how it is.” The phrase “*wala nang alisan*” (they won’t leave) says it perfectly. Corruption is not occasional bribes; it is a permanent way of being, where real existence and needs are forgotten in favor of pork barrel projects and kickbacks.
The volunteer call fights back like what Deleuze and Guattari call a “war machine” — flexible, leaderless networks, powered by social media’s fast spread rather than rigid parties. US support adds a dose of hard-nosed international politics. This is ironic, given America’s colonial history in the Philippines. It highlights a painful reality for weaker countries: local energy often needs a big patron’s backing to break free from elite control. Snark again: it is peak post-colonial irony to call on the old colonizer to help clean up corruption, when many elites owe their position to that same history.
Deeper Layers: Arendt, Hobbes, and the Pasig Version of Leviathan
Hannah Arendt would see this as the difference between *labor* (the daily grind of keeping corruption running), *work* (building lasting institutions), and *action* (people freely appearing together in public to create real politics). The Pasig volunteers represent *action* — many voices, revealing truth, full of risk. They try to take back public space from the private empires of traditional politicians (*trapos*).
But Arendt warns these moments are fragile. Without building real structures afterward, they fade into stories or worse, lead to new dictators. The promise of quick change by the end of the day risks a common trap of instant populism: what about tomorrow, when people need food, fares, and face the same slow bureaucracy run by the usual suspects?
Thomas Hobbes appears in the shadows, smirking. Even a flawed ruler keeps some order amid the “war of all against all” in a system of favors and rivalries. Overthrow it with a crowd, and what new monster (Leviathan) takes its place? The snark here doubts blind faith in “the people” as automatically good. History shows crowds, once stirred, often welcome new bosses. The million might show up, but will they go home when fresh corrupt faces put on reformist masks?
Even deeper, this feels like a Gnostic rebellion against the false gods of Philippine politics. The corrupt elites (dynasties, big businesses, trapos) rule a broken material world of deals and payoffs. The volunteers chase a pure spirit of genuine nationhood (*bayan*). US support acts as ambiguous foreign wisdom. Success would restore the whole body politic. Failure repeats the eternal Filipino cycle of disappointment.
Sharp Observations: The Same Old Story at the Crossing
Admire the boldness, but pity the repetition. Philippine politics follows a predictable script: anger, gathering, splitting, and absorption back into the system. Crossing Pasig becomes another stop on this endless road. The thousand will mix true believers, opportunists, online radicals, and aunties chasing likes. The million is promised, but real life — traffic, food prices, rain — gets in the way. The corrupt rarely get fully removed; they adapt, rebrand, and talk “unity” while the stealing goes on.
Yet the statement’s strength is its rejection of total cynicism. It believes that at some critical mass of bodies and emotion, the downward spiral can reverse. Philosophy at its best mixes sharp humor with wonder. This idea asks whether ordinary Filipinos (*tao*) can still surprise their rulers — not via savior figures or foreign ideas, but by simply showing up in huge numbers: a thousand today, a million tomorrow, a crowd that stays until the decay is cut out.
In the end, every place has its own “Crossing.” It is the point where giving up meets standing up. The volunteers are not just complaining about policies; they are acting out a different way of existing. Whether it leads to real removal of the corrupt or just another round of “same old, same old” is still open. But the bet is placed. *Asahan nyo.* The crowd is on the move.
SHARE THIS ON YOUR WALL. šš¼
Tayo ang lakas ng Pilipinas. šµš
Ipaglaban natin siya
sa kamay ng mga kurakot ng sarili nating gobyerno! š
#WeAreOne
Para Sa Pilipinas
Iglesia Ni Kristo Rally in EDSA
The Scandal That Should Finally END Martin Romualdez | by CJ Hirro
https://youtu.be/Q-lGipwnCe0?si=L5xoHXLdX9lTh1Nk&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQPMjc1MjU0NjkyNTk4Mjc5AAEeVeknWDZQFnSz7oQnCgPaBzJLHSTP_K9Y1tOk_xaEZq_kFryVA-OWSlLCAYI_aem_kJaaaT7cMsaL5HUWo2oOPg
---
*** credit to the owners of the photo & articles otherwise cited
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09053027965. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™' s connection to the Asian Cultural Council (ACC) serves as a defining pillar of his professional journey, most recently celebrated through the launch of the ACC Global Alumni Network.As a 2003 Starr Foundation Grantee, Roldan participated in a transformative ten-month fellowship in the United States. This opportunity allowed him to observe contemporary art movements, engage with an international community of artists and curators, and develop a new body of work that bridges local and global perspectives.Featured Work: Bridges Beyond Borders His featured work, Bridges Beyond Borders: ACC's Global Cultural Collaboration, has been chosen as the visual identity for the newly launched ACC Global Alumni Network.Symbol of Connection: The piece represents a private collaborative space designed to unite over 6,000 ACC alumni across various disciplines and regions.Artistic Vision: The work embodies the ACC's core mission of advancing international dialogue and cultural exchange to foster a more harmonious world.Legacy of Excellence: By serving as the face of this initiative, Roldan's art highlights the enduring impact of the ACC fellowship on his career and his role in the global artistic community.Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs and prompts. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
Asian Cultural Council Alumni Global Networkhttps://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philanthropy while working for institutions simultaneously early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/voluntary services entity and aims to remain so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
LanguageLoginCreate connection,Value conversation.For youWho we areMeet the teamICM cultureHow to applyStoriesContact usLanguageManage your cookie preferencesPrivacy & Cookie PoliciesTerms of useGlobal code of conduct & ethicsAll rights reserved Amiel Gerald Roldan® 2026***Disclaimer:This work is my original writing unless otherwise cited; any errors or omissions are my responsibility.The views expressed here are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of any organization or institution.Furthermore, the commentary reflects my personal interpretation of publicly available data and is offered as fair comment on matters of public interest. It does not allege criminal liability or wrongdoing by any individual.
Comments