The Rehashed Ledger: PhilHealth, Corruption, and the Theater of Budgetary Illusion
The Rehashed Ledger: PhilHealth, Corruption, and the Theater of Budgetary Illusion
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™
February 28, 2026
Introduction: The Theater of Numbers
In the Philippines, numbers are not merely digits; they are actors in a grand national play. Budgets, deficits, surpluses—these are not neutral figures but characters with costumes, scripts, and stage directions. When the government announces a “budget” for PhilHealth in 2026, the audience claps politely, believing the spectacle. Yet behind the curtain, the stagehands are frantically repainting old props, recycling stolen costumes, and pretending that yesterday’s theft is today’s generosity.
The premise is simple, though grotesque: the supposed “funding” for PhilHealth is not new money at all, but a rehashed ledger—a return of what was pilfered in 2024 and 2025, now paraded as benevolence. The irony is pungent: the administration congratulates itself for “allocating” funds that were never theirs to withhold. Citizens, meanwhile, are treated as gullible spectators, expected to applaud the illusion of fiscal responsibility while their pockets remain empty.
The Anatomy of Rehash
To “rehash” is to recycle, to dress up stale bread as fresh. In culinary terms, it is the reheating of yesterday’s sinigang until the sourness becomes bitterness. In bureaucratic terms, it is the laundering of corruption into competence. The administration’s claim of a PhilHealth budget in 2026 is precisely this: a reheating of stolen funds, a culinary deception served on porcelain plates of official press releases.
The irony is double-edged. First, the government pretends to have “found” money, when in fact it merely returned what it had previously misplaced into private pockets. Second, the act of returning is framed as generosity, as though the thief who returns your wallet deserves a medal for honesty.
Anecdote: The Neighborhood Sari-Sari Store
Imagine a sari-sari store in Mandaluyong. The tindera announces that she has “restocked” the shelves. The neighbors rejoice, believing that new goods have arrived. But upon closer inspection, the “new” stock is merely the same sardines she borrowed from their kitchens last week, now returned dented and half-open. The tindera insists: “See? I am providing for you!” The neighbors, weary and hungry, nod reluctantly, for what choice do they have?
PhilHealth’s budgetary illusion is precisely this sari-sari store trick. Citizens are told that healthcare funding is secure, when in fact the shelves are filled with recycled promises and dented cans of corruption.
The Humane Dimension: Health as a Right
Healthcare is not a luxury; it is a right. To manipulate its funding is not merely an economic misstep but a moral failure. When PhilHealth’s budget is rehashed, the consequence is not abstract—it is felt in the bodies of patients denied dialysis, mothers unable to afford prenatal care, and children whose fevers escalate into tragedies.
The irony is cruel: while officials debate numbers in air-conditioned halls, the sick debate whether to pawn their last cellphone to pay for antibiotics. The rehashed budget is not only a cover-up of incompetence; it is a betrayal of the humane principle that health should never be hostage to political theater.
Esoteric Reflection: The Alchemy of Corruption
In medieval alchemy, base metals were transformed into gold through secret formulas. In Philippine bureaucracy, corruption is transformed into competence through press releases. The alchemy is simple:
- Step 1: Steal funds in 2024 and 2025.
- Step 2: Return them in 2026, calling it a “budget.”
- Step 3: Announce the miracle of fiscal discipline.
This is not alchemy but parody. The philosopher’s stone here is deception, and the gold produced is fool’s gold—shiny enough to dazzle headlines, worthless enough to betray the sick.
The Erudite Critique: Institutional Incompetence
PhilHealth has long been plagued by inefficiency. Reports of ghost patients, fraudulent claims, and mismanaged funds are not anomalies but patterns. The rehashed budget is symptomatic of a deeper malaise: institutional incompetence.
The administration’s act of returning stolen funds is akin to a student who plagiarizes an essay, gets caught, and then resubmits the same essay with footnotes. The incompetence is not corrected; it is merely disguised. The institution remains hollow, its credibility eroded, its function compromised.
Irony and Satire: The Budget as Comedy
There is humor here, though bitter. The announcement of a PhilHealth budget in 2026 is comedic in its absurdity. It is as though a magician pulls a rabbit out of a hat, only for the audience to realize that the rabbit was stolen from their own backyard. The applause is forced, the laughter hollow.
The Filipino public is treated as the punchline of this joke. “Grabeng ginagawang stupid ang mga Pilipino,” indeed. Without explanation, the illusion persists. With explanation, the comedy reveals itself as tragedy.
Critical Reflection: The Politics of Cover-Up
The rehashed budget is not merely incompetence; it is deliberate cover-up. By announcing a “budget,” the administration distracts from the theft of previous years. The narrative shifts from corruption to generosity, from incompetence to competence.
This is the politics of cover-up: to rewrite history by recycling theft into benevolence. The danger is profound. If citizens accept the illusion, corruption becomes normalized, incompetence becomes tradition, and deception becomes governance.
Poignancy: The Human Cost
Behind every budget line is a human story. The dialysis patient who skips sessions because PhilHealth coverage is delayed. The mother who delivers her child in a cramped barangay clinic because hospital fees are prohibitive. The elderly who ration their medicines because reimbursements are uncertain.
The poignancy lies in the contrast: while officials boast of billions “allocated,” ordinary Filipinos count coins for paracetamol. The rehashed budget is not merely a fiscal trick; it is a betrayal of human dignity.
Anecdote: The Classroom Lesson
In a classroom in Quezon City, a teacher explains the concept of honesty. She tells her students: “If you borrow money, you must return it. But returning it does not make you generous; it makes you merely decent.” The students nod. One asks: “Ma’am, what if the borrower announces to the whole school that he is generous for returning the money?” The teacher sighs: “Then he is not honest; he is a politician.”
PhilHealth’s budgetary illusion is precisely this classroom lesson writ large. The administration announces generosity, but the act is merely the return of borrowed—or stolen—funds. Honesty is twisted into propaganda.
The Academic Frame: Structural Loss
From a policy perspective, the rehashed budget reflects structural loss. Institutions designed to protect citizens are hollowed out by corruption. Budgets meant to secure healthcare are diverted into private gain. The return of stolen funds does not repair the structure; it merely patches the cracks with deception.
Structural loss is not easily reversed. It requires reform, transparency, accountability. The rehashed budget offers none of these. It offers only illusion, a temporary plaster on a crumbling wall.
Conclusion: The Call for Explanation
The Filipino public deserves explanation, not illusion. Without voices to clarify, citizens are indeed treated as stupid—forced to accept recycled theft as generosity. The task of critique, then, is urgent. To expose the rehashed budget is to reclaim dignity, to insist that healthcare is a right, not a stage prop.
The irony is sharp, the humor bitter, the critique erudite. Yet the conclusion is humane: the health of Filipinos must never be hostage to corruption and incompetence. The rehashed ledger must be exposed, the cover-up dismantled, the illusion shattered.
Only then can PhilHealth fulfill its promise—not as a theater of numbers, but as a genuine institution of care.
---
2026 National Budget Overview
- Total Budget: ₱6.793 trillion (7.4% higher than 2025; about 22% of GDP)
- By Sector:
- Social Services: ₱2.314 trillion (34.1%)
- Economic Services: ₱1.868 trillion (27.5%)
- General Public Services: ₱1.202 trillion (17.7%)
- Debt Burden: ₱978.7 billion (14.4%)
- Defense: ₱430.9 billion (6.3%)
---
Health Sector Funding (DOH + PhilHealth)
- Total Health Allocation: ₱320.5 billion
- This includes Department of Health programs and PhilHealth subsidies.
---
PhilHealth Specific Funding (2026)
PhilHealth’s budget story is unusual and politically charged:
- 2025: ₱0 subsidy (PhilHealth received no government funding)
- 2026: ₱129.76 billion total allocation
- ₱53.13 billion → Subsidy for the National Health Insurance Program
- ₱60 billion → Restored funds that had been wrongfully remitted to the national treasury in 2024
- ₱16.5 billion → Additional funds realigned from the DPWH budget during bicameral conference talks
---
Key Departments (Top Allocations)
| Department | 2026 Allocation |
|------------|-----------------|
| Education (DepEd) | ₱928.5 billion |
| Public Works (DPWH) | ₱881.3 billion |
| Health (DOH + PhilHealth) | ₱320.5 billion |
| Defense | ₱430.9 billion |
| Debt Service | ₱978.7 billion |
---
Critical Note
The PhilHealth budget in 2026 is not “new” money in the strict sense. Much of it is a return of previously misallocated or withheld funds (2024–2025), now repackaged as a fresh allocation. This is why critics argue it is a rehash meant to cover up past corruption and incompetence, rather than a genuine expansion of healthcare investment.
---
If you like my any of my concept research, writing explorations, art works and/or simple writings please support me by sending me a coffee treat at my paypal amielgeraldroldan.paypal.me or GXI 09163112211. Much appreciate and thank you in advance.
Just featured at https://www.pressenza.com/2026/01/the-asian-cultural-council-global-alumni-network-amiel-gerald-a-roldan/
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ curatorial writing practice exemplifies this path: transforming grief into infrastructure, evidence into agency, and memory into resistance. As the Philippines enters a new economic decade, such work is not peripheral—it is foundational.
I'm trying to complement my writings with helpful inputs from AI through writing. Bear with me as I am treating this blog as repositories and drafts.
Please comment and tag if you like my compilations visit www.amielroldan.blogspot.com or www.amielroldan.wordpress.com
and comments at
amiel_roldan@outlook.com
amielgeraldroldan@gmail.com
A multidisciplinary Filipino artist, poet, researcher, and cultural worker whose practice spans painting, printmaking, photography, installation, and writing. He is deeply rooted in cultural memory, postcolonial critique, and in bridging creative practice with scholarly infrastructure—building counter-archives, annotating speculative poetry like Southeast Asian manuscripts, and fostering regional solidarity through ethical art collaboration.
Recent show at ILOMOCA
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16qUTDdEMD
https://www.linkedin.com/safety/go?messageThreadUrn=urn%3Ali%3AmessageThreadUrn%3A&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pressenza.com%2F2025%2F05%2Fcultural-workers-not-creative-ilomoca-may-16-2025%2F&trk=flagship-messaging-android
https://alumni.asianculturalcouncil.org/?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPlR6NjbGNrA-VG_2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHoy6hXUptbaQi5LdFAHcNWqhwblxYv_wRDZyf06-O7Yjv73hEGOOlphX0cPZ_aem_sK6989WBcpBEFLsQqr0kdg
Amiel Gerald A. Roldan™ started Independent Curatorial Manila™ as a nonprofit philantrophy while working for institutions simultaneosly early on.
The Independent Curatorial Manila™ or ICM™ is a curatorial services and guide for emerging artists in the Philippines. It is an independent/ voluntary services entity and aims to remains so. Selection is through proposal and a prerogative temporarily. Contact above for inquiries.
Comments